论强制仲裁程序的强制性

发布时间：2018-05-20 22:18

本文选题：《联合国海洋法公约》强制仲裁 + 国家仲裁　；参考：《外交学院》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：《联合国海洋法公约》(以下简称《公约》)在海洋法领域起到了重要的作用,解决了许多有关海洋方面的纠纷。但是,随着各国实践的深入,公约的不完善之处也开始显现。学术界一直关注公约所建立的被认为是目前为止最复杂的纠纷解决机制。建立在国际公法背景上的争端解决机制在该公约出现之前一贯实行任择性的解决方式,而该公约为了改变此种常态试图构建某种强制性解决机制。但是由于世界各国利益不平衡加之主权国间并不愿意在此完全交出自己的权限而由公约进行管辖,最后公约的强制性机制还是被迫受到局限,以各国自愿协议选择争端解决机制为优先,强制程序作为缺省程序在最后被适用。菲律宾单方面提出的“南海仲裁案”也涉及所谓的“强制仲裁”问题。因此,本文就《公约》中的“强制仲裁”制度的产生及其在公约中的具体设置进行阐述。从国家仲裁产生与发展的角度,对比分析常设仲裁法院以及强制仲裁程序对国家仲裁的突破与发展。最后结合南海仲裁的实践分析强制程序在案件中机制本身存在的单方意志性以及南海案仲裁庭程序上的错误之处。
[Abstract]:The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (hereinafter referred to as the Convention) has played an important role in the field of the law of the sea. However, with the deepening of the practice of various countries, the imperfections of the convention began to appear. The academic community has been concerned that the convention is regarded as the most complex dispute settlement mechanism by far. The dispute settlement mechanism established in the context of public international law has always practised optional means of settlement prior to the emergence of the Convention, and the Convention attempts to construct some kind of compulsory settlement mechanism in order to change this normal state. However, as a result of the imbalance in the interests of the countries of the world and the unwillingness of sovereign States to surrender their competence entirely and be governed by the Convention, in the end the mandatory mechanism of the Convention was forced to be limited. Preference is given to the choice of dispute settlement mechanisms by voluntary national agreements, and mandatory procedures are applied as the default procedure in the end. The South China Sea Arbitration case unilaterally filed by the Philippines also deals with so-called "compulsory arbitration". Therefore, this paper expounds the emergence of "compulsory arbitration" system in the Convention and its specific setting in the Convention. From the point of view of the emergence and development of national arbitration, this paper compares and analyzes the breakthrough and development of the permanent Court of Arbitration and the compulsory arbitration procedure to the state arbitration. Finally, combining with the practice of the South China Sea arbitration, the author analyzes the unilateral will of the compulsory procedure in the case itself and the procedural errors of the arbitration tribunal in the South China Sea case.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】