网络发展对国际民事司法管辖权的冲击及对策研究
发布时间:2018-05-21 03:43
本文选题:民事管辖 + 网络司法管辖权 ; 参考:《新疆大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着经济的发展和科技的进步,网络越来越受到人们的青睐,由此带来的网络纠纷也随之增多。网络环境是不同于现实空间的虚拟世界,其自身具有全球性、客观真实性和管理的非中心性等特点。在网络环境下发生纠纷时,网络自身的特点对传统管辖规则的适用带来了极大的挑战,传统的管辖规则在面临新生事物时其弊端也逐渐显现,如挑选法院现象的频繁出现对司法程序的挑战等。针对这些问题,目前理论界已经出现了新主权理论、管辖权相对论等理论。英、美、德等国也在司法实践中进行了步履维艰的探索,但由于国际统一规则的缺失,不同国家在解决这类问题时又面临着国家主权的维护、外国法院判决的执行等新问题。鉴于上述问题的存在,,本文采用归纳演绎法、案例分析法、比较法等研究方法,在对传统管辖规则予以扬弃的基础上,介绍了不方便法院原则和国际礼让原则,并对我国互联网司法管辖制度的改进提出了几点设想,即深化全球合作范围、将科技手段引入民事管辖活动以及完善协议管辖制度等,期望对网络纠纷的解决尽微薄之力。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy and the progress of science and technology, the network is more and more popular, which brings more disputes. The network environment is a virtual world which is different from the real space. It has the characteristics of global, objective authenticity and non-central management. When disputes occur in the network environment, the characteristics of the network itself bring great challenges to the application of the traditional jurisdiction rules, and the disadvantages of the traditional jurisdiction rules gradually appear when they are faced with new things. For example, the frequent appearance of court selection challenges the judicial process. In view of these problems, the theory of new sovereignty and the theory of relativistic jurisdiction have emerged. Britain, the United States, Germany and other countries have also made difficult explorations in judicial practice. However, due to the lack of international uniform rules, different countries are faced with new problems such as the maintenance of national sovereignty and the execution of foreign court decisions. In view of the existence of the above problems, this paper introduces the inconvenient court principle and the international comity principle by the methods of inductive deduction, case analysis, comparative law and so on, on the basis of sublation of the traditional jurisdiction rules. This paper also puts forward some tentative ideas for the improvement of China's Internet jurisdiction system, that is, deepening the scope of global cooperation, introducing scientific and technological means into civil jurisdiction activities and perfecting the agreement jurisdiction system, etc., in the hope of making a modest contribution to the settlement of network disputes.
【学位授予单位】:新疆大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D997
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 苏洁;;浅议反垄断法的域外适用[J];法制与社会;2011年08期
2 卢正敏,齐延安;论涉外民事诉讼中不方便法院原则[J];山东审判;2005年05期
3 胡洪亮;;知识产权法律冲突问题浅析[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2009年03期
4 徐伟功,黄鹏;简析美国国际平行诉讼中的禁诉命令[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年05期
5 王晓晔;;我国反垄断法的域外适用[J];上海财经大学学报;2008年01期
6 周昕,张翼;因特网时代的民事司法管辖权[J];政治与法律;2002年02期
7 尹利君;;胡伯、斯托雷和戴西的国际私法思想比较研究[J];法制与社会;2008年30期
8 周昕;因特网民事司法管辖权探析[J];河北法学;2002年01期
9 刘宁元;;自我约束的单边方法和国际协调——以美国反垄断法域外管辖实践为视角[J];政治与法律;2011年11期
10 李旺;美国联邦法院关于国际诉讼竞合的法律规制[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年06期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 王s
本文编号:1917620
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1917620.html