论我国建构南海船舶交通服务区制度的必要性与可行性——以加拿大为鉴

发布时间：2018-05-21 06:12

本文选题：历史性权利 + 历史性所有权　；参考：《法学评论》2017年02期

【摘要】：在南海仲裁案的裁决结果中,仲裁庭否定了中国历史性权利的主张,也否定了"九段线"的法律效力。该裁决存在诸多法理上的谬误。裁决否定历史性权利对中国的不利影响在于,其否定了历史性权利下丰富的权利类型;南海争端当事国可能会利用仲裁庭否定历史性权利谋求不当利益;部分域外国家可能利用非法的裁决谋求私利。加拿大对北极西北航道水域有"历史性水域"的主张,该主张是历史性权利的一种,加拿大通过建构北极船舶交通服务区制度宣示和强化了其海洋主张。在后南海仲裁案时代,我国借鉴加拿大船舶交通服务制度具有充分的必要性和可行性,我国需要批判性地借鉴加拿大北极船舶交通服务区制度,以维护我国在南海的"历史性权利"。
[Abstract]:In the award of the South China Sea arbitration case, the arbitral tribunal denied the claim of Chinese historical right and the legal effect of "Nine Duan Line". There are many legal fallacies in the ruling. The negative effect of ruling on the historical right lies in the fact that it negates the rich types of rights under the historical right, and the parties to the South China Sea dispute may use the arbitration tribunal to deny the historical right to seek improper interests; Some foreign countries may use illegal rulings for personal gain. Canada has a claim of "historic waters" to the waters of the Arctic Northwest Passage, which is a kind of historical right. Canada declares and strengthens its maritime claims through the construction of the Arctic vessel Traffic Service area system. In the post-South China Sea arbitration case era, it is necessary and feasible for our country to draw lessons from the Canadian ship traffic service system, and we need to critically learn from the Canadian Arctic vessel traffic service area system. In order to safeguard China's "historical rights" in the South China Sea.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“海洋强国战略下中国在国家管辖外海域权益的法律保障”(14JJD820003) 2014年上海市哲学社会科学青年项目“北极东北航道与中国海洋权益的国际法保障研究”(2014EFX004)的资助
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】