BEPS背景下“专利盒”税制的跨国协调:国际标准与中国应对

发布时间：2018-05-23 15:25

  本文选题：专利盒 + 税基侵蚀与利润转移　； 参考：《税务与经济》2017年04期

【摘要】：为降低无形资产产生收入的实际税负,以鼓励企业的研发活动和科研成果的转化,欧盟多国引入了专利盒税制。同时,为吸引无形资产向本国转移,各国竞相放宽享受专利盒税制的限制条件,然而却被跨国公司的避税安排所利用,进而诱发了跨国税基侵蚀问题。对此,经合组织制定实质性活动标准和关联法,并要求包括中国在内的参与国均以此审视本国相关税制。其中,实质性活动标准可有效遏制税基侵蚀问题,并与专利盒税制正当性基础的内在逻辑相一致。但关联法的规定已超出落实此标准之必要,不利于纳税人的经济自由和专利盒制度本身目的的实现。因此,中国在落实经合组织的标准时应当对二者区别对待,贯彻实质性活动标准的同时,批判借鉴关联法的规定。
[Abstract]:In order to reduce the actual tax burden on the income generated by intangible assets and to encourage the R & D activities of enterprises and the transformation of scientific research results, many EU countries have introduced the patent box tax system. At the same time, in order to attract intangible assets to transfer to their own countries, countries are competing to relax the restrictions of the patent box tax system. However, they are used by the tax avoidance arrangements of multinational corporations, which leads to the problem of transnational tax base erosion. In response, the OECD has set standards for substantive activities and relevance laws, and has asked participating countries, including China, to look at their own tax systems. Among them, the substantial activity standard can effectively contain the problem of tax base erosion, and is consistent with the inherent logic of the legitimate basis of the patent box tax system. However, the relevant law has exceeded the necessity of implementing this standard, which is not conducive to the taxpayer's economic freedom and the realization of the patent box system itself. Therefore, when implementing the OECD standard, China should treat the two differently and implement the substantive activity standard while criticizing and drawing lessons from the provisions of the association law.
【作者单位】： 厦门大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“应对BEPS背景下完善中国反避税法律体系研究”(项目编号:14AZD153)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D996.3
，

本文编号：1925324