国际商事调解程序研究

发布时间：2018-05-23 17:23

本文选题：国际商事调解 + 程序　；参考：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：当今社会,随着世界经济的飞速发展,国际商事主体之间的交流与合作越来越频繁,国际商事领域的争议也日渐增多并日益复杂。伴随着国际商事主体对高效率、低成本经济观念的追求以及对和谐、自治等法律观念的崇尚,商事主体们不断探寻着最优的争议解决方式。近年来,传统的诉讼机制不断暴露出程序刻板、繁琐的弊病,曾经以快捷、灵活著称的仲裁机制也因程序被严格规制而染上了浓厚的诉讼色彩。在这种形势下,国际商事调解以其独特的优势成为了商事主体们的新宠。在解决争议的各种方式中,国际商事调解逐渐成为争议当事人优先选择的对象。在学理界,国际商事调解也变得备受关注。尽管目前对国际商事调解的研究已硕果累累,但仔细研习却发现,这些论著几乎都是对调解的特点、调解协议的效力、调解与仲裁结合等问题的探讨,对调解程序的设置、优势与弊端等程序性问题鲜有提及。因此,在日益重视程序正义的今天,有必要对国际商事调解程序进行专门的研究,从程序的角度对调解机制进行深层次的探讨。本文运用归纳法、比较分析法、实证分析法、理论联系实际的方法,以国际商事调解程序为研究对象,以调解程序的进展为线索,对现行的国际、国内立法与实践进行对比分析,从调解程序的设置上分析调解程序的优势,并指出调解制度在国际商事领域盛行的原因。本文旨在狭义上研究国际商事调解程序,即独立的调解机构处理国际商事争议的过程,而不包括结合于其他争议解决方式中的调解程序。相对于诉讼和仲裁而言,国际商事调解程序具有意思自治、灵活、高效、协商解决争议的优势。这些优势使得国际商事调解作为ADR最具代表性的一种,已超越诉讼、仲裁成为国际商事领域最受欢迎的争议解决方式。程序的优势来源于程序的设置。通观各个国家、国际组织关于国际商事调解程序的立法与实践,不论是调解程序的启动、调解会议的召开,还是调解程序的终止,都彰显着意思自治、灵活、高效等特征。在国际商事调解程序中,当事人能够自由地表达意志,充分地支配程序,以满足他们期望达到的综合目的。调解程序不仅能帮助当事人妥善解决他们之间的争议,而且能满足商人们保全声誉和体面、维系商务关系的愿望。调解程序所呈现的上述特点是其越来越受到商事主体亲睐的原因,也是其得以存续和发展的力量源泉。不必担心调解程序会流于任意和武断,也不必担心调解程序会沦为强者规避法律、压制弱者的工具,优秀而有经验的调解员在调解程序中的适度介入能有效地解决这些问题。试图从立法上对调解程序加以控制,将调解程序变得严格而规范,以消除众人的上述顾虑是无益的,那样只会让调解程序重蹈仲裁的覆辙。要使调解程序更好地处理争议,强化调解员队伍建设,不断提高调解员的素质才是可行之道。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the rapid development of the world economy, the exchange and cooperation among international commercial subjects are more and more frequent, and the disputes in the field of international commercial affairs are increasing and complex day by day. With the pursuit of high efficiency, low cost economic concept, harmony, autonomy and other legal concepts, commercial subjects are constantly looking for the best way to resolve disputes. In recent years, the traditional litigation mechanism has constantly exposed the procedural stereotypes, cumbersome shortcomings, once known for its speed and flexibility, arbitration mechanism has been heavily affected by the strict regulation of the procedure. In this situation, international commercial mediation with its unique advantages has become the new favorite of commercial subjects. In the various ways of resolving disputes, international commercial mediation has gradually become the preferential choice of disputing parties. In the academic world, international commercial mediation has also become a concern. Although the research on international commercial mediation has been fruitful at present, it is found through careful study that these works are almost all about the characteristics of mediation, the effectiveness of mediation agreements, the combination of mediation and arbitration, and the setting up of conciliation procedures. Advantages and disadvantages and other procedural issues rarely mentioned. Therefore, with the increasing emphasis on procedural justice, it is necessary to conduct a special study on the procedure of international commercial mediation, and to probe deeply into the mediation mechanism from the point of view of procedure. This paper uses inductive method, comparative analysis method, empirical analysis method, the method of combining theory with practice, taking international commercial mediation procedure as the research object, taking the progress of mediation procedure as the clue, to the current international, This paper makes a comparative analysis of domestic legislation and practice, analyzes the advantages of mediation procedure from the point of view of the establishment of mediation procedure, and points out the reasons for the prevalence of mediation system in the field of international commercial affairs. The purpose of this paper is to study the procedure of international commercial conciliation in a narrow sense, that is, the process of dealing with international commercial disputes by independent conciliation agencies, but not the conciliation procedure combined with other dispute settlement methods. Compared with litigation and arbitration, international commercial mediation procedure has the advantages of autonomy of will, flexibility, efficiency, negotiation and settlement of disputes. These advantages make international commercial mediation, as one of the most representative of ADR, has surpassed litigation, and arbitration has become the most popular dispute settlement method in international commercial field. The advantage of program comes from the setting of program. Looking at the legislation and practice of international commercial mediation procedure in various countries, whether it is the initiation of conciliation procedure, the convening of conciliation conference or the termination of mediation procedure, it shows the characteristics of autonomy of will, flexibility and efficiency. In the procedure of international commercial conciliation, the parties can freely express their will and fully dominate the procedure in order to meet the comprehensive purpose they expect to achieve. The mediation procedure can not only help the parties to resolve their disputes properly, but also satisfy the desire of businessmen to preserve their reputation and dignity and maintain business relations. The above characteristics of mediation procedure are the reason why it is more and more favored by commercial subjects and the source of its survival and development. There is no need to worry that the mediation procedure will flow into arbitrariness and arbitrariness, nor that the mediation procedure will become a tool for the strong to circumvent the law and suppress the weak. The moderate intervention of excellent and experienced mediators in the mediation process can effectively solve these problems. It is not helpful to try to control the mediation procedure by legislating, and to make the mediation procedure more strict and standardized, so as to remove the above concerns, which will only lead the mediation procedure to repeat the mistakes of arbitration. It is feasible to make the mediation procedure deal with disputes better, strengthen the construction of mediators and improve the quality of mediators.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.4

【相似文献】