论WTO争端解决中司法经济原则的适用
发布时间:2018-05-26 11:00
本文选题:WTO争端解决 + DSU ; 参考:《兰州大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:WTO争端解决机制的运行实践充分展示了DSB有效解决成员方贸易争端的成就与特色。其中,由专家组实践并由上诉机构予以认可的司法经济原则就是DSB争端解决的特色之一。司法经济原则是DSB在总结以往GATT争端解决实践基础上确立和逐步完善的。司法经济原则源于国内法,在一国国内司法审判实践中,为了节约司法资源提高司法效率,审判方会对当事方的某些诉求不予审理。WTO争端解决中司法经济原则的适用是指WTO专家组无需对争端当事方的每一诉求进行裁决,而只需裁决争端解决所必需处理的诉求。司法经济原则的适用不但有助于实现专家组和上诉机构快速公正解决争端的目标,而且还能有效避免对WTO协定规则模糊、空白之处作出超越其争端解决权限的法律解释或裁决。另一方面,司法经济原则的适用也会督促WTO成员方加快相关规则多边谈判和协商的进程。与此同时,WTO争端解决对司法经济原则的适用的影响及其存在的问题也日益受到参诉方和国际法学术界的关注。 为对WTO争端解决中司法经济原则的适用做一全面的介绍、评价和论述,本文分为五部分。第一部分为司法经济原则的概述。具体介绍司法经济原则的概念、国内法渊源及其与相关概念的联系和区别。第二部分详细论述WTO争端解决中司法经济原则适用的实践。该部分首先对WTO争端解决程序做一简要介绍,然后从专家组程序和上诉审理程序两个层面对司法经济原则的确立和发展做一全面论述和探讨。第三部分论述了司法经济原则适用推动争端快速公正解决的积极影响,司法经济原则适用存在的问题和解决思路。第四部分阐述了司法经济原则适用实践带给我国的启示。 分析探讨WTO适用司法经济原则的实践有助于提升我国应对WTO争端解决机构对我涉诉案件适用司法经济原则的能力,同时积累应对司法经济原则适用的经验。
[Abstract]:The practice of WTO dispute settlement mechanism fully demonstrates the achievements and characteristics of DSB in resolving trade disputes among its members. One of the characteristics of DSB dispute settlement is the principle of judicial economy, which is practiced by the panel and recognized by the appellate body. The principle of judicial economy is established and gradually perfected by DSB on the basis of summing up the practice of GATT dispute settlement. The principle of judicial economy originates from domestic law. In order to save judicial resources and improve judicial efficiency, in the practice of judicial trial in a country, The application of the principle of judicial economy in dispute settlement means that the WTO panel does not need to rule on each claim of the parties to the dispute, but only needs to adjudicate the claims that must be dealt with in dispute settlement. The application of the principle of judicial economy can not only help to realize the goal of the panel and the appellate body to resolve disputes fairly and quickly, but also can effectively avoid the ambiguity of the rules of the WTO agreement and make legal interpretations or decisions that exceed their competence of dispute settlement. On the other hand, the application of judicial economic principles will urge WTO members to speed up the process of multilateral negotiation and negotiation of relevant rules. At the same time, the influence of WTO dispute settlement on the application of judicial and economic principles and its existing problems have been paid more and more attention by the litigants and the academic circles of international law. In order to introduce, evaluate and discuss the application of judicial economic principle in WTO dispute settlement, this paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the summary of the principle of judicial economy. This paper introduces the concept of judicial economic principle, the origin of domestic law and its relation and difference with related concepts. The second part discusses the practice of applying the principle of judicial economy in WTO dispute settlement. This part first makes a brief introduction to the WTO dispute settlement procedure, and then discusses the establishment and development of the judicial economic principle from the two aspects of panel procedure and appeal procedure. The third part discusses the positive impact of the application of judicial economic principles to promote the speedy and just settlement of disputes, the problems existing in the application of judicial economic principles and the solutions. The fourth part expounds the enlightenment brought to our country by the application practice of judicial economic principle. The analysis and discussion of the practice of applying the principles of judicial economy to WTO will help to enhance the ability of our country's dispute settlement bodies to apply the principles of judicial economy to cases involving our litigation, and at the same time to accumulate experience in the application of the principles of judicial economy.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱广东;;WTO争端解决中的司法克制及其对我国的启示[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年01期
2 江必新;程琥;;论判例在WTO争端解决中的适用[J];法律适用;2010年Z1期
3 杨国华;WTO争端解决中的司法节制原则[J];法学杂志;2002年01期
4 张乃根;;论WTO争端解决的国内法审查[J];法学家;2008年03期
5 石静霞,胡荣国;试从GATS第6条与第16条的关系角度评“美国博彩案”[J];法学;2005年08期
6 胡加祥;;中国参与WTO争端解决机制的实证分析[J];法学;2008年11期
7 韩立余;世界贸易组织规则的解释[J];国际贸易问题;2000年03期
8 王友根;龚柏华;;中美出版物和音响产品市场准入WTO争端案述评[J];国际商务研究;2010年01期
9 赵艳敏;;从美国高地棉花补贴案看农产品出口补贴的法律适用问题[J];甘肃社会科学;2007年03期
10 肖威;;WTO争端胜诉方“申请授权报复”的程序问题研究——“世贸组织争端解决规则与程序的谅解”第21.5条和第22.6条之间的顺序问题[J];河北法学;2008年01期
,本文编号:1936987
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/1936987.html