“一带一路”建设下礼让原则在承认和执行外国法院判决中的可行性研究

发布时间：2018-05-27 08:17

本文选题：礼让原则 + 互惠原则　；参考：《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：礼让原则作为国际私法中的一项基本原则,在一些普通法国家的司法实践中被赋予了新的作用。礼让原则不仅表现了对主权国家的承认,同时也表现了对主权国家司法行为的尊重。互惠作为我国承认和执行外国法院判决的主要原则,在司法实践中主要表现为条约互惠和事实互惠,2017年《南宁声明》又确立了推定互惠。此前司法实践中对互惠先例的查明责任不明确和恪守事实互惠导致别国利用互惠对我国实施报复。在我国"一带一路"战略提出之后,应在司法实践中结合礼让原则的精神,将礼让原则作为互惠的前提性条件,二者互为补充,进一步推动推定互惠的发展和适用范围,从而发挥我国在促进全球民商事判决承认和执行领域的积极作用。
[Abstract]:As a basic principle in private international law, the principle of comity has been given a new role in the judicial practice of some common law countries. The principle of comity not only shows the recognition of the sovereign state, but also shows the respect for the judicial behavior of the sovereign state. Reciprocity, as the main principle of recognizing and enforcing the judgments of foreign courts in China, is mainly manifested in treaty reciprocity and factual reciprocity in judicial practice, and the 2017 Nanning Declaration establishes the presumption of reciprocity. In previous judicial practice, the lack of clear responsibility and adherence to reciprocity in judicial practice led other countries to take advantage of reciprocity to retaliate against China. After the "Belt and Road" strategy is put forward in our country, we should combine the spirit of the principle of comity in the judicial practice, regard the principle of comity as the prerequisite condition of reciprocity, they complement each other, and further promote the development and application scope of the presumption of reciprocity. In order to play a positive role in promoting the global recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments.
【作者单位】：武汉大学法学院;
【基金】：国家留学基金管理委员会“国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目”(留金发[2016]3100号)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D997

【相似文献】