安全港规则适用的法律分析

发布时间：2018-05-27 19:28

本文选题：安全港规则 + 法律分析　；参考：《哈尔滨工业大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着计算机网络的不断普及，人类越来越感受到信息时代的魅力。与此同时，，迅猛的数字传播技术给版权保护带来了巨大的冲击，很多国家通过修改版权法律制度或者制定专门规定，加强了对网络环境下版权人的保护。虽然对于知识产权的保护是对权利人智力劳动成果的尊重，加大知识产权的保护力度会推动社会经济的发展，但是基于商业利益的主导，在知识产权的某些领域，已经出现了知识产权保护过度的现象，在信息网络传播权的保护领域尤为严重。安全港规则的出台将众多的网络服务商从诉讼的漩涡中拯救了出来。在世界范围内，欧盟和美国的相关法律法规对于安全港规则的实践处于领先地位。欧盟的《电子商务令》为网络服务提供商提供了统一明确的执行标准，便于进行操作。美国的《数字千年版权法》中明确确立了安全港规则，它最早将安全港规则纳入了法律，规定内容也比较全面，为信息网络传播权保护的纠纷提供了审理的法律依据。利用规范分析法，将安全港规则的适用剖析分为四个方面，分别从主体要件、客体要件、主观方面、客观方面进行分析阐述。并且，结合相关案例进行了从理论到实践的论证，将国际上与我国的立法实践进行对照，对安全港规则进行了全方位的剖析。通过对安全港规则适用的解析，不难发现目前在国际上对此规则的操作仍然存在诸多问题。由此可见，实现安全港规则背后网络中介服务商、版权人以及接受中介服务的用户三方利益均衡是目前的重要目标。我国立法中的有关规定也存在诸多弊端需要完善和解决。因此，借鉴国际的一些立法经验，对我国的版权保护领域提出立法建议是十分必要的。
[Abstract]:With the popularization of computer network, people feel the charm of the information age more and more. At the same time, the rapid digital communication technology has brought a huge impact to copyright protection. Many countries have strengthened the protection of copyright owners under the network environment by modifying the copyright legal system or formulating special regulations. Although the protection of intellectual property rights is a respect for the intellectual labor achievements of the right holders, increasing the protection of intellectual property rights will promote social and economic development, but based on the dominance of commercial interests, in some areas of intellectual property rights, There has been the phenomenon of excessive protection of intellectual property rights, especially in the field of information network transmission right protection. The introduction of safe harbour rules will numerous network service providers from the whirlpool of litigation out of the rescue. Worldwide, the European Union and the United States have a leading role in the practice of safe harbour rules. The European Union's e-commerce order provides uniform and clear enforcement standards for internet service providers. The "Digital Millennium copyright Law" of the United States clearly established the rule of safe harbour. It first incorporated the rule of safe harbour into the law, and the content of the regulation was also relatively comprehensive, which provided the legal basis for the dispute of the protection of the right of information dissemination on the network. By means of normative analysis, the application and analysis of safe harbour regulations are divided into four aspects, which are the subjective elements, the object elements, the subjective aspects and the objective aspects. Combined with relevant cases, this paper demonstrates from theory to practice, compares the international legislation practice with our country's legislative practice, and analyzes the safe harbour rules in all directions. It is not difficult to find that there are still many problems in the international operation of the safe Harbor Code through the analysis of its application. It can be seen that it is an important goal to balance the interests of network intermediary service providers, copyright owners and users receiving intermediary services. There are many disadvantages in the legislation of our country. Therefore, it is very necessary to draw lessons from some international legislative experiences and put forward legislative suggestions in the field of copyright protection in China.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996

【参考文献】