中国民商事域外送达制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-27 19:20

本文选题：域外送达 + 海牙送达公约　；参考：《华东政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着国际商事活动的日益频繁，国际民商事诉讼也日趋增加。作为涉外诉讼进行的基本前提，司法文书的域外送达是中国乃至世界各国司法实践力图克服的难点之一。鉴于各国法律制度的不同，各国在民商事司法文书域外送达领域上存在分野。为促进送达效率，各国在国际、国内两个层面做出了诸多努力。目前，六十五个国家或地区加入了《关于向国外送达民事或商事司法文书和司法外文书公约》，欧盟在其成员国内推行了第1348/2000号送达规则，美洲各国之间形成了《美洲国家间关于嘱托书的公约》等。此外，各国通过相互之间缔结双边司法协作协定或条约和各自出台国内立法对域外送达进行协调。中国目前的域外送达制度主要由《海牙送达公约》、双边条约和国内法构建而成。送达方式以中央机关送达为主，外交和领事送达、邮寄送达、电子送达等替代送达方式为辅。因各国对公约作出的保留、双边条约的差异及国内法的模糊，中国的域外送达制度在司法实践中存在诸多问题。本文以上海市第二中级人民法院域外送达情况为样本，剖析了中国域外送达制度的现状和困阻，并从经验总结、制度借鉴和国际合作等方面为中国域外制度的完善提供建议。本文正文分为五部分。第一章对民商事领域司法文书域外送达的范畴进行了界定，并着重介绍了《海牙送达公约》规定的中央机关送达方式和其他替代送达方式，并统计分析了各缔约国对公约作出的保留。第二章介绍了各国在域外送达领域的分歧和合作，，通过对比德国、法国和美国的送达制度来说明不同法系在域外送达领域的分歧，同时通过介绍公约、双边司法协助协定来体现各国之间的合作。第三章着重介绍了法律、司法解释、部门文件等多个层面的中国域外送达制度渊源和司法实践中对不同双边关系情形下中国和外国之间的域外送达机制适用原则。第四章以上海市第二中级人民法院为样本分析了中国域外送达领域的困阻，针对直接送达、邮寄送达和公告送达中出现的疑难进行分析，并总结了送达准备工作、送达方式选择和试点措施等实践经验。第五章从现行制度和实践操作的优化组合、外国先进制度的借鉴以及国际合作的强化等三个方面，对中国域外制度的完善提出建议。
[Abstract]:With the increasing frequency of international commercial activities, international civil and commercial litigation is also increasing. As the basic premise of foreign litigation, the extraterritorial service of judicial documents is one of the difficulties in judicial practice in China and the world. In view of the different legal systems of different countries, there is a distinction in the field of civil and commercial judicial documents. In order to promote the efficiency of service, countries have made a lot of efforts at the international and domestic levels. At present, 65 countries or regions have acceded to the Convention on the Service of Judicial and Non-judicial documents in Civil or Commercial matters abroad. The European Union has introduced the 1348 / 2000 service rule in its member states. Between the countries of the Americas, the Inter-American Convention on Testament, and so on. In addition, countries coordinate their extraterritorial delivery through the conclusion of bilateral judicial cooperation agreements or treaties and their respective domestic legislation. China's current system of extraterritorial service is mainly based on the Hague Convention on Service, bilateral treaties and domestic laws. The mode of service is mainly served by the central authorities, supplemented by diplomatic and consular service, mail service, electronic service and so on. Due to the reservations made by various countries to the Convention, the differences of bilateral treaties and the ambiguity of domestic laws, there are many problems in the judicial practice of China's extraterritorial service system. Taking the case of the extraterritorial service of the second Intermediate people's Court of Shanghai as a sample, this paper analyzes the present situation and difficulties of China's extraterritorial service system, and provides suggestions for the perfection of China's extraterritorial system from the aspects of summing up experience, drawing lessons from the system and international cooperation. The text of this paper is divided into five parts. The first chapter defines the scope of extraterritorial service of judicial documents in the field of civil and commercial affairs, and emphatically introduces the service methods of the central authorities and other alternative modes of service stipulated in the Hague Convention on Service. And statistical analysis of the reservations made by States parties to the Convention. The second chapter introduces the differences and cooperation between countries in the field of extraterritorial service. By comparing the service systems of Germany, France and the United States of America, it explains the differences between different legal systems in the field of extraterritorial service, and at the same time introduces the Convention. Bilateral mutual legal assistance agreements reflect cooperation between countries. The third chapter focuses on the legal, judicial interpretation, departmental documents and other aspects of China's extraterritorial service system origin and judicial practice of different bilateral relations between China and foreign countries between the extraterritorial service mechanism applicable principles. The fourth chapter takes Shanghai No. 2 Intermediate people's Court as a sample to analyze the difficulties in the field of overseas service in China, analyzes the difficulties in direct service, mail service and announcement service, and summarizes the preparatory work for service. Service mode selection and pilot measures and other practical experience. The fifth chapter puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of China's extraterritorial system from three aspects: the optimized combination of current system and practical operation, the reference of foreign advanced system and the strengthening of international cooperation.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.3

【相似文献】