涉外网络侵权管辖权问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-28 02:14

本文选题：涉外网络侵权行为 + 涉外网络侵权管辖权　；参考：《北方工业大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：由于互联网的技术与时俱进的不断发展着,人们生活的各个部分与网络之间变得更加密不可分。网络的空间更像是种数字化的存在,而非现实的存在,[1]因此在网络背后是物理世界的人在网上做出的一个个行为,全世界各地的人都可以同处于一个虚拟平台中发布言论观点、传递与交换数据信息、进行各类交易活动等等,所以未曾有过的联系也就自然出现,随之而来的是不可避免的涉外网络侵权问题。诚然跳出现实视角互联网就像是一个独立个体空间,但网络使用者仍然是现实社会的公民,虚拟联系现实的关系密不可分,所以它仍需要受到实际法律的管控。探索网络无边界性、虚拟性和自治性的特征,并且认真审视由它而生的诸如各国黑客通过侵袭他国的电脑系统、跨国传播电脑病毒等等具有明显涉外因素的网络侵权行为,对解决网络侵权管辖权有着很大的帮助。不断变革更新的网络以及立法本身的滞后性限制,使得以属地管辖、属人管辖、协议管辖和专属管辖为主的传统民事诉讼管辖体制受到了极大地冲击,很大程度上动摇了相关传统法学理论。因而关于涉外网络侵权管辖权的新理论纷纷涌现而出,各国也随之探索出适应网络新挑战和本国实际情况的相关司法实践,中国便是其中之一。本文经由国际私法的角度切入,按逻辑顺序分为四个章节。第一部分重点解析了网络的特征,研究了网络侵权行为的内涵和涉外因素。第二部分主要阐述了传统国际民事诉讼管辖权确立标准以及网络对其的挑战。第三部分重点厘清了确定涉外网络侵权管辖权的新理论以及许多国家的司法实践。第四部分剖析了中国涉外网络侵权管辖权的法律现状,力求通过研究厘清涉外网络侵权的管辖权问题,为我国这部分的相关法律提出完善建议。
[Abstract]:With the development of the technology of Internet, every part of people's life and network become more and more inseparable. The space of the web is more like a digital existence than a physical existence, [1] so behind the network is the behavior of people in the physical world on the Internet, where people from all over the world can share their opinions on the same virtual platform. Transmission and exchange of data information, all kinds of trading activities, so that there has not been any connection will naturally appear, followed by the inevitable foreign network infringement problem. It is true that the Internet is like an independent individual space from the perspective of reality, but the network user is still a citizen of the real society, and the relationship between virtual contact and reality is inseparable, so it still needs to be controlled by the actual law. Exploring the characteristics of the network that is borderless, fictitious and autonomous, and taking a careful look at the network infringement resulting from it, such as hackers from various countries who invade other countries' computer systems, transnational transmission of computer viruses, and so on, which have obvious foreign factors. To solve the network infringement jurisdiction has the very big help. The constantly changing network and the lag limitation of the legislation itself make the traditional jurisdiction system of civil action, which is based on territorial jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, agreement jurisdiction and exclusive jurisdiction, has been greatly impacted. To a large extent, the traditional theory of law has been shaken. As a result, new theories about foreign network tort jurisdiction have emerged, and various countries have also explored relevant judicial practices to adapt to the new network challenges and their own actual conditions, among which China is one of them. From the perspective of private international law, this paper is divided into four chapters in logical order. The first part focuses on the analysis of the characteristics of the network, the connotation of network tort and foreign factors. The second part mainly elaborated the traditional international civil action jurisdiction establishment standard and the network challenge to it. The third part mainly clarifies the new theory of determining the jurisdiction of foreign network infringement and the judicial practice of many countries. The fourth part analyzes the current legal situation of the foreign network tort jurisdiction in China, and tries to clarify the jurisdiction of the foreign network infringement through the study, and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the relevant laws in this part of our country.
【学位授予单位】：北方工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D997.1

【参考文献】