商业秘密预防性保护之比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-02 04:29

本文选题：商业秘密预防性保护 + 威胁性侵害　；参考：《大连海事大学》2012年博士论文

【摘要】：商业秘密因其脆弱性需要对其予以预防性保护,而本文所指的预防性保护是仅针对商业秘密威胁性侵害这一种情况而言的。威胁性侵害并不是一种侵权行为,但在此种情况下,商业秘密处于一种将被不可避免侵害的危险之中,因此对其予以预防性保护也是急迫而且必要的,且相对于事后救济,预防性保护更注重的是消除侵害的危险,阻止侵害的发生。商业秘密预防性保护是必要的,这不仅源于商业秘密的价值性,还在于其知识产权的属性,而妨害预防是其知识产权请求权的当然内容之一,而商业秘密的秘密性更决定了预防性保护对其的特殊意义。除此之外,现实中针对商业秘密威胁性侵害的多发性也是预防性保护的重要原因之一。在商业秘密预防性保护上,有建立在其知识产权属性上的产权式保护和基于威胁性侵害特点的契约式保护两种方式。在对各国商业秘密预防性保护比较分析的基础上,将预防性保护的模式归纳为产权式保护与契约式保护并用的模式及单一的契约式预防性保护模式两种类型。在并用模式下,以对威胁性侵害的判断方法为标准,又可将并用模式分为建立在独立判断基础上的产权式保护与契约式保护并用模式与合同确定的产权式保护与契约式保护并用模式两类。我国承认商业秘密的知识产权属性,但却仅对其予以契约式的保护,这显然是与其的性质不相符的,因此产权式保护与契约式保护并用的模式是我国应选择的商业秘密预防性保护之路。以竞业禁止合同的约定作为判断威胁性侵害是否存在的依据不仅避免了事后竞业禁止合同之嫌,而且又将竞业禁止合同的约定与威胁性侵害的判定统一化,因此合同确定的产权式保护是符合我国现状的产权式预防性保护方式。在并用模式下,不仅在现有的体系与制度上要做相应的补充与完善,而且竞业禁止合同的合理性也被赋予了新的涵义,这也便于司法实践中统一合理性的认定标准。我国虽没有日本员工终身制的用工习惯,但其却给了我国企业重要的员工管理方面的启示,而员工的良性流动不仅不妨碍商业秘密的保护,而且有利于竞争环境的形成。
[Abstract]:Trade secrets need to be protected precautionary because of their vulnerability, and the precautionary protection mentioned in this paper is only aimed at the situation of threatening infringement of trade secrets. Threatening violations are not a violation, but in such cases trade secrets are in danger of being inevitably infringed, and its preventive protection is therefore urgent and necessary, as opposed to ex post facto relief, Preventive protection pays more attention to eliminating the danger of infringement and preventing the occurrence of infringement. The preventive protection of trade secrets is necessary, not only from the value of trade secrets, but also from the nature of their intellectual property rights, and prejudice prevention is one of the natural contents of their intellectual property claims. The secrecy of trade secrets determines the special significance of preventive protection. In addition, the number of threatening violations of trade secrets in reality is also one of the important reasons for preventive protection. In the protection of trade secret, there are two ways: property right protection based on intellectual property and contract protection based on threatening infringement. On the basis of comparative analysis of the preventive protection of trade secrets in various countries, the preventive protection model is divided into two types: the combination of property rights protection and contractual protection and the single contractual preventive protection mode. In the combined mode, the method of judging threatening aggression is taken as the standard. It can also be divided into two types: property rights protection based on independent judgment and contractual protection and contractual property rights protection and contractual protection. Our recognition of the intellectual property attributes of trade secrets, but the contractual protection of them, is clearly incompatible with their nature. Therefore, the combination of property right protection and contract protection is the way to protect trade secrets in our country. Taking the agreement of the non-compete contract as the basis for judging the existence of threatening infringement not only avoids the suspicion of non-competition contract after the event, but also unifies the agreement of the non-competition contract and the judgment of threatening infringement. Therefore, the property right protection determined by the contract is a kind of property right preventive protection which accords with the present situation of our country. Under the mode of use, not only the existing system and system should be supplemented and perfected, but also the rationality of non-competition contract has been given a new meaning, which is convenient to unify the standard of rationality in judicial practice. Although our country does not have the Japanese employee lifelong employment custom, but it has given our country enterprise the important employee management aspect enlightenment, and the staff benign flow not only does not hinder the protection of the trade secret, but also is advantageous to the competitive environment formation.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997

【参考文献】