论中国对《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》第1条第1款（b）项的保留

发布时间：2018-06-04 22:09

本文选题：CISG第1条第1款(b)项 + 保留　；参考：《暨南大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：经济生活的日益国际化要求打破阻碍国际商事交往顺利进行的法律障碍,《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》(简称CISG或《公约》)在这样的形势下应运而生,它是联合国国际贸易法委员会主持起草的一项影响广泛的国际货物买卖合同方面的实体法公约。但大多数国家均对CISG第1条第1款(b)项提出了保留,中国也认为CISG第1条第1款(b)项的实施会增加适用的不确定性以及制约了国内法律制度的适用,也对此款提出保留。鉴于目前《公约》在法院和仲裁庭的广泛应用,笔者以法院和仲裁庭的实践为基础来研究CISG第1条第1款(b)项的具体应用以及中国撤销此项保留的必要性和可行性。本文分为四部分。第一部分主要是对CISG第1条第1款(b)项的内容及其具体应用进行分析。第二部分是对《公约》第95条的出台背景进行介绍,着重探讨各国对CISG第1条第1款(b)项提出保留后《公约》在适用上的复杂局面及保留所带来的利弊后果。第三部分以中国为视角,从中国法院与仲裁庭的实践出发,解读中国提出保留后《公约》在中国的具体适用,进而评析该项保留对当事人、法院、及仲裁机构的影响。第四部分主要对中国取消该项保留的可行性和必要性以及撤销保留的后续问题进行总结论述。
[Abstract]:The increasing internationalization of economic life requires to break down the legal obstacles that hinder the smooth international commercial exchanges. Under such circumstances, the United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Sale of goods (CISG or the Convention) came into being. It is a substantive law convention on contracts for the international sale of goods, drafted under the auspices of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). However, most countries have made reservations to Article 1, paragraph 1, of CISG, and China also has reservations that the implementation of Article 1, paragraph 1, of CISG will increase the uncertainty of application and restrict the application of domestic legal system. In view of the wide application of the Convention in the courts and arbitral tribunals at present, the author, based on the practice of the courts and arbitral tribunals, studies the specific application of Article 1, paragraph 1 (b) of CISG and the necessity and feasibility of withdrawing this reservation in China. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part mainly analyzes the content and application of item 1 (1) of CISG. The second part is an introduction to the background of Article 95 of the Convention, focusing on the complicated situation of the application of the Convention after the reservation of Article 1 (1) (b) of the CISG and the advantages and disadvantages of the reservation. In the third part, from the perspective of China, from the practice of Chinese courts and arbitral tribunals, the author interprets the application of the Convention in China after China has made a reservation, and then comments on the impact of the reservation on the parties, courts and arbitration institutions. The fourth part summarizes the feasibility and necessity of the cancellation of the reservation by China.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997

【参考文献】