论中菲南海强制仲裁案的相关法律问题

发布时间：2018-06-05 09:28

本文选题：强制仲裁 + 管辖权　；参考：《南昌大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：2013年1月22日菲律宾提交仲裁,历经三年半至2016年7月12日仲裁庭发布判决,标志着中菲南海仲裁案到此结束了。对于中国来说,这是一次不寻常的经历,值得学界深刻研究。本文主要分析仲裁案中涉及的相关法律问题,除去引言和结语,正文章节分为四章,第一章是“中菲南海仲裁案综述”,从中菲南海争议的背景入手,阐述中菲南海争议的法学理论,进而分析菲律宾提交的仲裁案要点。第二章是选取了三个国际法上类似案件与南海仲裁案对比,涉及的程序分别是强制仲裁、国际法院、国际仲裁,从中得出了解决南海争端的四点经验:(1)可考虑提交国际法院;(2)慎交国际仲裁;(3)再临强制仲裁,积极应对;(4)双方协商谈判,互利共赢。第三章讨论的是中菲南海仲裁的违法性分析,分别从仲裁程序违法、仲裁庭无管辖权、仲裁裁决无效性三个方面进行分析。第四章是“解决南海争端的法律建议”,先阐述了主权至上、合作共赢是解决南海争端的原则。针对第二章的经验经过分析,提出了三点建议:可考虑提交国际法院、慎交国际仲裁、坚持谈判解决南海争端。文章最后通过结语对全文进行总结。
[Abstract]:In January 22, 2013, Philippines submitted arbitration to the arbitration tribunal for three and a half to July 12, 2016, which marked the end of the arbitration case in the South China Sea. For China, it was an unusual experience and worthy of a profound study. This article mainly analyzes the relevant legal issues involved in the arbitration case, removing the introduction and concluding remarks. The article section is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is a summary of the arbitration case of the South China Sea in the South China Sea. Starting with the background of the dispute between the South China Sea and the South China Sea, the paper expounds the legal theory of the dispute between the South China Sea and the South China Sea, and then analyzes the main points of the arbitration case submitted by Philippines. The second chapter is the comparison of the similar cases in the international law and the South China Sea arbitration case, and the procedures involved are respectively compulsory. Arbitration, the International Court of justice and international arbitration have drawn four points of experience for the settlement of the South China Sea dispute: (1) it may consider submitting the International Court of justice; (2) prudent international arbitration; (3) further arbitration and active response; (4) the two sides negotiate and win mutual benefit. The third chapter is an analysis of the illegality of the Sino Philippine south China Sea arbitration, which is illegal and arbitrated from the arbitration procedure. The court has no jurisdiction and the three aspects of the invalidity of arbitration award. The fourth chapter is "the legal proposal to solve the dispute over the South China Sea". First, it expounds the supremacy of sovereignty, and the win-win cooperation is the principle to solve the South China Sea dispute. According to the analysis of the experience of the second chapter, it puts forward three suggestions: to consider the submission of the international court, to carefully submit international arbitration and to persist in the discussion Finally, the article concludes the whole article by concluding remarks.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D993.5

【参考文献】