美国反补贴措施应对研究

发布时间：2018-06-07 21:12

本文选题：WTO + 补贴　；参考：《复旦大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：反补贴措施作为世贸协议框架下的贸易救济手段之一,由于直接剑指政府经济政策,实质隐藏着对中国政府产业政策乃至经济政策的牵制作用。自2004年加拿大政府对华启动首例反补贴措施以来,美国、欧盟纷纷加入对中国采取反补贴措施的行列。甚至连南非、墨西哥这样的发展中国家对中国也已小试牛刀。本文所研究的领域仅限于美国政府针对涉华产品所提起的反补贴措施,我国企业如何应对,如何利用美国国际贸易法院对政府贸易保护措施的司法审查制度寻求司法救济以及在此过程中政府如何发挥管理、服务职能,维护民族企业和产业利益的最大化,维护国内经济政策的稳定性和自主性。本文共分四部分。第一部分从反补贴措施的概述及其市场经济理论基础方面论述,提出中国产品应对反补贴措施调查必须树立新的完全市场经济理念。第二部分通过案例分析美国对华产品采取反补贴措施的历史演变,美国对华产品采取反补贴措施的现状,我国政府和企业在应对方面存在的问题等等。第三部分从实体抗辩和程序策略方面探讨如何应对美国商务部和国际贸易委员会提起的反补贴调查。第四部分主要论述我国政府应对美国反补贴措施过程中如何发挥政府职能作用,组织、引导企业应诉和起诉,保护民族产业安全。
[Abstract]:Countervailing measures as one of the trade remedies under the framework of the WTO agreement, because the direct sword refers to the economic policy of the government, it actually conceals the restraining effect on the industrial policy and even the economic policy of the Chinese government. Since the Canadian government launched its first countervailing measures to China in 2004, the United States and the European Union have joined the ranks of countervailing measures against China. Even developing countries such as South Africa and Mexico have tried their best against China. The field studied in this paper is limited to the countervailing measures initiated by the US government against products involving China, and how Chinese enterprises should deal with it. How to make use of the judicial review system of American International Trade Court to seek judicial remedy for the government's trade protection measures, and how the government can give full play to the functions of management, service, and safeguard the maximization of the interests of national enterprises and industries in the process. To maintain the stability and autonomy of domestic economic policies. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the outline of countervailing measures and the theoretical basis of market economy. The author points out that the investigation of countervailing measures for Chinese products must set up a new concept of complete market economy. The second part analyzes the historical evolution of countervailing measures taken by the United States against Chinese products and the current situation of countervailing measures taken by the United States against Chinese products through a case study. The third part discusses how to deal with the countervailing investigation initiated by the US Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission from the aspects of substantive defense and procedural strategy. The fourth part mainly discusses how to deal with the countervailing investigation initiated by the US Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission. This paper discusses how our government should play the role of government in the process of countervailing measures in the United States. To organize and guide enterprises to respond to suit and sue and to protect the safety of national industries.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.1;F752.02

【相似文献】