WTO专家组程序问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-07 22:49

本文选题：专家组程序 + 举证责任　；参考：《复旦大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：自WTO成立以来,其争端解决机制在解决国际贸易争端领域内发挥了巨大的作用,尤其是其中的专家组程序作为争端解决的第一层权力机构,赢得了越来越多的信赖与尊重。本文从介绍专家组程序的基本理论出发,分析了专家组程序的准司法性特征,对专家组程序的性质作出界定,并概括专家组程序对GATT的发展和突破。但是专家组程序并不是完美无缺的,它在实际运作中也暴露出来一些问题和缺陷。本文探讨了专家组程序中的几个热点问题,如专家组组成问题,期间评审程序目的的落空,举证责任的混乱及“初步事实”理论的应用,以及透明度问题产生的争议等。本文从几个方面切入,对专家组程序运作过程中暴露出的上述不足提出自己的改革建议,如探讨了常设专家组设想的可能性,并提出一种新的专家组指示性名单选择标准；专家组程序中的“第三方”制度,肯定了第三方制度在专家组程序中积极意义,并探讨了第三方权利扩大的范围和限制。最后,本文联系我国在专家组程序中的实践,对其进行评析并得到启示,同时概括了中国在WTO改革谈判中的提议,并对中国如何应对WTO专家组程序提出了对策和建议。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of WTO, its dispute settlement mechanism has played a great role in the field of settlement of international trade disputes, especially the panel procedure, as the first layer of authority of dispute settlement, has won more and more trust and respect. Based on the introduction of the basic theory of expert group procedure, this paper analyzes the quasi-judicial characteristics of expert group procedure, defines the nature of expert group procedure, and generalizes the development and breakthrough of expert group procedure to GATT. But the expert group procedure is not perfect, it also exposes some problems and defects in actual operation. This paper discusses several hot issues in the panel procedure, such as the composition of the panel of experts, the failure of the purpose of the evaluation procedure during the review process, the confusion of the burden of proof and the application of the theory of "preliminary facts", as well as the controversy arising from the issue of transparency. From several aspects, this paper puts forward some reform proposals for the above deficiencies in the course of the expert group procedure, such as exploring the possibility of the permanent expert group, and putting forward a new criteria for the selection of the indicative list of the expert group. The "third party" system in the expert group procedure affirms the positive significance of the third party system in the panel procedure, and probes into the scope and limitation of the expansion of the third party right. Finally, this paper reviews and enlightens China's practice in panel procedure, summarizes China's proposals in WTO reform negotiations, and puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions on how China should deal with WTO panel procedure.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】