WTO对华特别保障措施中“市场扰乱”问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-07 23:33

本文选题：市场扰乱 + 中国入世法律文件　；参考：《外交学院》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：“市场扰乱”概念出现在《中国加入世界贸易组织议定书》（以下简称《议定书》）和《中国加入世界贸易组织工作组报告书》（以下简称《工作组报告》）这两个中国入世法律文件中，其中《议定书》第16条规定了针对中国一般产品的特殊保障措施，《工作组报告》第242条规定了针对中国纺织品的特殊保障措施。“市场扰乱”作为这两项特保条款的一个核心概念，对特殊保障措施的实施有重要意义。由于这两个条款的内容简单，对于市场扰乱的概念规定的模糊不清，给市场扰乱的界定带来很大的自主裁量性。作为专门针对中国的特殊条款，，这些不利因素影响了中国的出口产业发展。因此本文通过分析《维也纳条约法公约》对条约解释规定的原则，以及实践中WTO争端解决专家组所作出的裁定，对《议定书》16条和《工作组报告》第242段中提及的市场扰乱进行法律解释，明确两个条款间适用的关系，并指出这两个条款是专门针对中国的条件宽松的保障条款，是对中国的歧视性待遇。同时，论文借鉴《保障措施协议》、《纺织品与服装协议》及《反倾销协议》的相关规定及有关WTO案例，从进口增加、国内产业、损害、因果关系等四个方面具体论证了“市场扰乱”的认定标准。本文旨在通过对包含市场扰乱内容的相关条款详细的分析理解，结合实际案例，为我国应对其他WTO成员发起的市场扰乱的特保调查提供可借鉴和参考的经验。
[Abstract]:The concept of "market disruption" appears in the Protocol on China's accession to the World Trade Organization (hereinafter referred to as the Protocol) and the report of the working Party on China's accession to the World Trade Organization (hereinafter referred to as the "report of the working Party"). In the WTO legal documents, Article 16 of the Protocol stipulates special safeguard measures for Chinese general products, and Article 242 of the report of the working Group stipulates special safeguard measures for Chinese textiles. Market disruption, as a core concept of these two special safeguard clauses, is of great significance to the implementation of special safeguard measures. Because the content of these two clauses is simple, the ambiguity of the concept of market disturbance brings great discretion to the definition of market disturbance. As a special clause for China, these unfavorable factors affect the development of China's export industry. Therefore, through the analysis of the principles of treaty interpretation stipulated in the Vienna Convention on the Law of treaties, as well as the ruling made by the WTO dispute settlement Panel in practice, The legal interpretation of the market disruption referred to in Article 16 of the Protocol and paragraph 242 of the report of the working Group, clarifying the relationship between the two provisions, and noting that the two articles are specific to China's lenient safeguards, It is discriminatory treatment against China. At the same time, the paper draws lessons from the relevant provisions of the Agreement on safeguard measures, the Agreement on Textiles and clothing and the Agreement on Anti-dumping, and relevant WTO cases, from the increase of imports, the domestic industry, the damage, Causality and other four aspects of the specific proof of "market disruption" standards. The purpose of this paper is to provide reference and experience for China to deal with the market disruption investigation initiated by other WTO members through the detailed analysis and understanding of the relevant articles containing market disruption and combining with practical cases.
【学位授予单位】：外交学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1

【相似文献】