已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决的域外效力研究
本文选题:已撤销 + 域外效力 ; 参考:《辽宁大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:目前,各国在已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决是否具有域外效力问题上并未达成一致,但国际上总的趋势是,传统理论坚持者仍然认为已撤销的国际商事仲裁裁决不具有域外效力,除非国际条约有相反规定;而多数的学者却认为在一定前提或条件下,裁决被撤销并不必然导致该裁决不具有域外效力。裁决被撤销有不同的理由,即使在赋予已撤销仲裁裁决域外效力的国家也是如此,对于以国际法的规定为依据进行的撤销,争议不大,但是对于以国内法的规定为依据进行的撤销,却争议颇大。裁决作出地法院撤销在其境内作出的裁决,有国内法上的依据;裁决执行地法院认定已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决是否具有域外效力,也有国内法上的依据。国内法是各主权国家在各自的主权国家管辖范围内制定的法律,其依据是国家主权原则和属地管辖权原则。但是各国国内法的规定千差万别,产生争议是不可避免的。 已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决的域外效力问题在仲裁界引起了巨大的反响。本文探讨的主要问题是:如果国际商事仲裁裁决被裁决地国法院撤销,执行地国法院是否还可以执行该被撤销了的裁决,依据什么样的标准承认与执行或者拒绝承认与执行该被撤销了的裁决,我国在已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决的域外效力上又有何态度,以及我国该以何种标准承认与执行或者拒绝承认与执行该被撤销了的裁决。 本文共分为四个部分,第一部分对已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决的域外效力进行概述,论述了国际商事仲裁裁决被撤销的含义和域外效力的含义,以及分析“国际商事仲裁裁决被撤销”和“域外效力”之间联系的必然性,并探讨已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决域外效力的发展趋势。第二部分阐述了已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决的域外效力的成因,从有关国家国内法的不同规定和具体的理论学说两方面来探讨。第三部分阐述了已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决的域外效力的国际法依据,从《纽约公约》和其它公约中寻找依据。最后论述已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决在中国的承认与执行的现状以及完善建议。
[Abstract]:At present, all countries have not reached agreement on whether the arbitral award has the extraterritorial effect of international commercial arbitral awards, but the general trend in the world is that the adherents of the traditional theory still believe that the international commercial arbitral awards that have been revoked are not extraterritorial, unless the international treaties have the opposite provisions; and the majority of scholars believe that it is on a certain premise or Under conditions, the revocation of the award does not necessarily lead to the extraterritorial effect of the adjudication. There are different reasons for the revocation of the award, even in the state given the extraterritorial effect of the arbitral award that has been revoked, and the revocation on the basis of the provisions of international law is not very controversial, but the withdrawal on the basis of the provisions of the domestic law is carried out. The decision made by the court to revoke the adjudication in its territory has the basis of domestic law; the decision of the court of execution affirms whether the arbitral award of the international commercial arbitral award has the extraterritorial effect or the basis of the domestic law. The domestic law is a law formulated by the sovereign states within the jurisdiction of each sovereign state. It is based on the principle of state sovereignty and territorial jurisdiction. However, the provisions of various domestic laws vary widely and disputes are inevitable.
The issue of the extraterritorial effect of the revocation of international commercial arbitral awards has caused great repercussions in the field of arbitration. The main issues discussed in this paper are: if the international commercial arbitration award is revoked by the ruling National Court, whether the Executive Court can still carry out the revoked award, and recognize and implement or refuse to comply with the criteria. In recognition and implementation of the revoked award, our country has the attitude of revoking the extraterritorial effect of the international commercial arbitral award, as well as our country's criteria for recognizing and implementing or refusing to recognize and implement the revoked adjudication.
This article is divided into four parts. The first part summarizes the extraterritorial effect of the revoked international commercial arbitration award, expounds the meaning of the revocation of the international commercial arbitration award and the meaning of the extraterritorial effect, and analyzes the inevitability of the connection between the revocation of international commercial arbitration award and the extraterritorial effect, and discusses the revocation of the country. The development trend of the extraterritorial effect of international commercial arbitration award. The second part expounds the causes of the extraterritorial effects of the revocation of international commercial arbitral awards, from the two aspects of the relevant state domestic law and the specific theory and theory. The third part expounds the international legal basis for the extraterritorial effect of the revocation of international commercial arbitral awards. From the New York Convention and other conventions, we will find the basis. Finally, we will discuss the status and suggestions for the recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitral awards in China.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D997.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜新丽;论外国仲裁裁决在我国的承认与执行——兼论《纽约公约》在中国的适用[J];比较法研究;2005年04期
2 肖威;;“非国内化”仲裁裁决的承认和执行问题研究[J];北京仲裁;2004年03期
3 谢新胜;;论争中的已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决之承认与执行[J];北京仲裁;2007年03期
4 李沣桦;;强制性规则与公共政策在商事仲裁裁决承认与执行中的适用研究[J];北京仲裁;2009年02期
5 曾涛;论示范法的理论基础及其在中国的运用[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2002年03期
6 宋连斌,黄进;《中华人民共和国仲裁法》(建议修改稿)[J];法学评论;2003年04期
7 杨成龙;;浅析我国撤销仲裁裁决制度的完善——最高院颁布关于仲裁法适用司法解释之后[J];法制与社会;2007年11期
8 熊育辉;我国国际私法关于“公共秩序”立法的审视[J];时代法学;2005年04期
9 赵秀文;论国际商事仲裁裁决的国籍及其撤销的理论与实践[J];法制与社会发展;2002年01期
10 郭玉军,陈芝兰;论国际商事仲裁中的“非国内化”理论[J];法制与社会发展;2003年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 杨弘磊;中国内地司法实践视角下的《纽约公约》问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 江仁所;论已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决的承认和执行[D];华东政法学院;2005年
2 周国杰;论承认与执行已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决[D];中国政法大学;2007年
,本文编号:2015252
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2015252.html