当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

涉外临时救济的三重困境及应对分析——兼评我国现行涉外临时救济体系

发布时间:2018-06-16 21:48

  本文选题:临时救济 + 冻结令 ; 参考:《现代法学》2017年06期


【摘要】:临时救济的适用已成为当前涉外诉讼中极具实践价值和理论意义的重要现象。然而,作为程序法中的救济机制,临时救济在全球化以及纠纷解决日趋复杂的时代大背景下遇到明显的困境,主要包括其自身架构的理论困境、国际民商事交往带来的实践难题以及司法协助中的合作僵局等。各国应致力于推进临时救济体系的重构与完善,回应临时救济适用的理论困境:临时救济应定位于制衡机制的引入,以实现当事人之间在诉讼以及整个纠纷解决过程中程序法意义上的平衡,即为当事人之间在先的"失衡状态"注入平衡因素。同时,各国在涉外临时救济的适用中应保持开放、合作的姿态并依托国际组织进行有效的协调或统一,以有效应对其中的实践难题与合作僵局。我国有关临时救济的立法尚不完善,司法实践较为混乱,建立在反思涉外临时救济困境基础之上的立法和司法完善成为必要。
[Abstract]:The application of temporary relief has become an important phenomenon of practical and theoretical significance in current foreign litigation. However, as a relief mechanism in procedural law, temporary relief meets obvious difficulties under the background of globalization and increasingly complex dispute resolution, including the theoretical dilemma of its own framework. The practical problems brought by international civil and commercial exchanges and the deadlock of cooperation in judicial assistance. Countries should devote themselves to the reconstruction and perfection of temporary relief system and respond to the theoretical dilemma of temporary relief application: temporary relief should be oriented to the introduction of checks and balances. In order to achieve the balance of procedural law between the parties in the litigation and the whole process of dispute settlement, the balance factor is injected into the "unbalanced state" of the parties in the first place. At the same time, countries should keep an open and cooperative attitude in the application of temporary relief concerning foreign affairs and rely on international organizations to coordinate or unify effectively in order to deal with the practical problems and the deadlock of cooperation effectively. The legislation of temporary relief in our country is not perfect and the judicial practice is more chaotic. It is necessary to perfect the legislation and judicature on the basis of reflecting on the predicament of temporary relief concerning foreign affairs.
【作者单位】: 中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】:2017年度北京市社会科学基金项目“外国判决在中国承认与执行中的若干关键问题研究”(17FXC031) 2015年度国家社科基金青年项目“国际民事诉讼中的临时措施研究”(15CFX069)
【分类号】:D997.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 于喜富;;论仲裁临时救济措施的决定与执行[J];山东审判(山东法官培训学院学报);2006年01期

2 朱丁普;;欧洲联盟反倾销直接诉讼中的临时救济措施[J];法律适用;2012年05期



本文编号:2028220

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2028220.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户43dc5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com