反倾销日落复审中“损害继续或再度发生可能性”问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-19 19:48

本文选题：反倾销日落复审 + 损害继续或再度发生　；参考：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：将日落复审制度纳入国际反倾销多边法律体系,是乌拉圭回合谈判的重要成果。虽然作为成员方妥协的产物,《反倾销协定》仅对日落复审条款进行了原则性规定,但是这一制度的出现,对防止反倾销措施的滥用仍具有重要意义。随着实践中越来越多五年反倾销措施期限的届满,日落复审制度日益受到各国关注。这一制度的核心在于考察:如果取消反倾销措施,倾销和损害是否会继续或者再度发生。由此可见,倾销和损害发生的可能性认定,是日落复审制度的重点。本文主要研究反倾销日落复审中“损害继续或再度发生可能性”问题,从制度层面入手,通过比较分析反倾销日落复审领域制度较为完善的欧盟和美国的相关立法与实践,为改进我国反倾销日落复审中“损害继续或再度发生可能性”的认定规则提供参考和建议。第一部分,考察WTO反倾销领域中日落复审“损害继续或再度发生可能性”问题的发展历程,通过分析制度的演变体会其真正的立法价值。由于《反倾销协定》对日落复审制度的规定较为模糊,使得相关的法律解释变得十分重要。WTO争端解决机构通过审理各国提交的有争议案件,对反倾销日落复审中有关损害发生可能性问题进行解释,为各国实践提供指导。第二部分,考察欧盟和美国在反倾销日落复审“损害继续或再度发生可能性”认定中的相关立法和实践。两者的立法、裁决方式各有特点,相比较而言,欧盟的立法与《反倾销协定》更为相似,仅对日落复审中的损害认定问题进行概括性规定,更多的规则见诸于案件和内部解释;美国的立法则较为细致,概括式列举了损害发生可能性认定中应当考查的指标。第三部分,考察当前中国反倾销日落复审制度中“损害继续或再度发生可能性”的认定问题。中国的日落复审制度是在借鉴西方发达国家的基础上发展起来的,无论是立法上还是实践中,都能找到欧美国家的影子。鉴于日落复审制度重要性的提升,建议中国参照美国的做法,进一步完善日落复审规定,采用概括列举的方式明确在损害发生可能性认定中应当考查的指标。同时,由于中国产业发展结构与西方发达国家相比,具有自己的特点,建议中国在制订损害可能性考查标准时,充分考虑国内产业的利益,使得我国的反倾销日落复审制度既与WTO《反倾销协定》保持一致,又能维护国内产业的正当权益。
[Abstract]:The incorporation of sunset review system into the multilateral legal system of international anti-dumping is an important result of the Uruguay Round negotiations. Although the Anti-Dumping Agreement, as a result of compromise among its members, only provides for the sunset review clause in principle, the emergence of this system is still of great significance in preventing the abuse of anti-dumping measures. With the expiration of more and more five-year anti-dumping measures in practice, sunset review system has attracted more and more attention. The core of this system is to examine whether dumping and injury will continue or occur again if anti-dumping measures are lifted. Thus, the possibility of dumping and injury is the focus of sunset review system. This paper mainly studies the possibility of continuing or reoccurrence of damages in antidumping sunset review, and analyzes the relevant legislation and practice of the EU and the United States, which are relatively perfect in the field of antidumping sunset review, starting from the system level. It provides reference and suggestions for improving the rules of "possibility of continuing or reoccurrence of damage" in China's antidumping sunset review. In the first part, the author examines the development of the issue of "possibility of continuing or reoccurrence of damage" in the field of WTO anti-dumping, and finds out its real legislative value through the analysis of the evolution of the system. As the provisions of the Anti-Dumping Agreement on the sunset review system are rather vague, the relevant legal interpretations become very important. The dispute settlement body of the WTO hears controversial cases submitted by various countries. To explain the possibility of damage in the review of anti-dumping sunset, to provide guidance for the practice of various countries. The second part examines the relevant legislation and practice of the EU and the United States in the anti-dumping sunset review of "the possibility of continued or recurrence of damage". The legislation and adjudication of the two countries have their own characteristics. Compared with the Anti-dumping Agreement, the legislation of the EU is more similar to that of the Anti-Dumping Agreement. It only makes a general provision on the issue of the determination of damages in the sunset review, and more rules are found in the case and the internal interpretation. The legislation of the United States is more meticulous, enumerating the indicators that should be examined in the determination of the possibility of damage. In the third part, the author examines the determination of the possibility of continuing or reoccurrence of damages in the current antidumping sunset review system in China. China's sunset review system is developed on the basis of drawing lessons from western developed countries. In legislation and practice, the shadow of European and American countries can be found. In view of the promotion of the importance of sunset review system, it is suggested that China should follow the practice of the United States, further improve the sunset review regulations, and make clear the indicators that should be examined in the determination of the possibility of damage by way of general enumeration. At the same time, since the industrial development structure of China has its own characteristics compared with that of the western developed countries, it is suggested that China fully consider the interests of domestic industries when formulating standards for examination of the possibility of damage. The system of antidumping sunset review in China is consistent with the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement and can safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of domestic industries.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.1

【引证文献】