论跨界损害环境影响评估的法律内涵

发布时间：2018-06-22 02:21

本文选题：跨界环境影响评估 + 《斯德哥尔摩宣言》原则　；参考：《法学评论》2010年03期

【摘要】：大部分北美和西欧国家已经颁布了国内环境影响评估法,同时,也采用了区域协定来规定跨界环境影响评估。区域性的环境影响评估协定在很大程度上反映了这些国内环境影响评估法。每一个跨界环境影响评估协定都是非歧视原则的适用。由于作为国际环境法基石的1972年《斯德哥尔摩宣言》原则21自身存在的缺陷,从逻辑上看来原则21是要求对可能引起跨界损害的活动进行潜在跨界影响评估,也就是跨界环境影响评估。同样的,评估也是一个通知和磋商的逻辑先决条件。胜于作为原则21的必然结果,跨界环境影响评估也可以被视为国内法律制度中发展的环境影响评估法的派生物或特别情况。国内环境影响评估并没有形成与原则21这一对重大或实质性的环境损害的普遍禁止规则相当的国内法。
[Abstract]:Most North American and Western European countries have enacted domestic environmental impact assessment laws, while regional agreements have been adopted to regulate transboundary environmental impact assessments. Regional environmental impact assessment agreements largely reflect these domestic environmental impact assessment methods. Every cross-boundary environmental impact assessment agreement is the application of the principle of non-discrimination. Owing to the shortcomings of principle 21 of the 1972 Stockholm Declaration as the cornerstone of international environmental law, principle 21 logically calls for a potential transboundary impact assessment of activities that may cause transboundary harm, That is, transboundary environmental impact assessment. Similarly, evaluation is a logical prerequisite for notification and negotiation. Rather than as a corollary of principle 21, transboundary environmental impact assessments can also be considered as biological or exceptional cases of environmental impact assessment laws developed in domestic legal systems. Domestic environmental impact assessments do not produce domestic law comparable to principle 21, a universal prohibition of significant or substantial environmental damage.
【作者单位】：广东商学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学青年项目“跨界环境损害的国家责任研究”(项目编号:08JC820009)的阶段性成果。
【分类号】：D996.9

【参考文献】