论互联网自由的人权属性及其适用
发布时间:2018-06-27 04:31
本文选题:互联网自由 + 限制自由 ; 参考:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年03期
【摘要】:新世纪以来,网络空间逐步从"以技术为中心"的无主地体系转变为"以人为中心"的权利体系。本质上,以人为中心的互联网自由体现为以权利为本位。互联网自由包括互联网表达自由、互联网信息获得自由、互联网基础设施和设备的可获得性以及互联网通讯自由。然而,互联网自由是相对的。对互联网自由的限制应至少满足三个条件:一是限制措施为法律所明确规定;二是措施满足合法性目标;三是措施具有必要性。作为负责任的大国,中国互联网规制政策并不违反国际人权协定。人权问题没有最好,只有更好。我国应在法律上明确信息利益主体的救济机制和争议解决方法,有理有据地保障网络空间的国家安全、公共利益和个人权益,并增强国内外互联网基础设施和设备的可获得性,解决地区性的"数字鸿沟"难题,以此打造全人类的网络空间命运共同体。
[Abstract]:Since the new century, cyberspace has gradually changed from "technology-centered" landless system to "human-centered" right system. In essence, the human-centered freedom of the Internet embodies the right-based. Internet freedom includes freedom of expression of the Internet, freedom of access to Internet information, availability of Internet infrastructure and equipment, and freedom of Internet communication. However, Internet freedom is relative. The restrictions on Internet freedom should satisfy at least three conditions: first, the restriction measures are clearly stipulated by the law; second, the measures meet the goal of legality; third, the measures have the necessity. As a responsible power, China's Internet regulation policy does not violate international human rights agreements. Human rights are not the best, only better. In our country, we should clarify the relief mechanism and dispute resolution methods of the information interest subject in law, protect the national security, public interest and individual rights and interests of cyberspace, and enhance the availability of Internet infrastructure and equipment at home and abroad. Solve the regional "digital divide" problem, so as to create a community of cyberspace destiny of all mankind.
【作者单位】: 中国社会科学院国际法研究所;
【基金】:国家法治与法学理论研究项目(16SFB3043)“中国应对WTO网络安全争端法律问题研究”
【分类号】:D998.2
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 新闻所 孟威;解读欧盟互联网法律监管[N];中国社会科学院院报;2007年
,本文编号:2072677
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2072677.html