国际法院解决领土争端中证明标准问题

发布时间：2018-06-29 01:38

本文选题：领土争端 + 证据优势标准　；参考：《当代法学》2011年05期

【摘要】：国际法院解决领土争端中,在证明标准方面,主要秉承了大陆法系传统,同时合理吸收了普通法系的传统。但是,基于当事国之间领土争端的复杂性和重要性,且由于主要受到大陆法系的影响,国际法院在司法实践中通常将证据优势标准置于主导地位。不过,国际法院在适用该标准时存在唯证据而证据的逻辑混乱的现象,甚至有时陷入单纯比较相关证据分量的游戏。这引起了国际社会对国际法院司法权威的一定质疑。实际上,国际法院内部也存在不同的声音,其证据规则仍处于不断演进之中。鉴于证据优势标准确定性程度相对较低,而排除合理怀疑标准定位过高,因此,今后一阶段国际法院在解决领土争端方面的证据标准应界定为"清晰和令人信服的标准"。这也是国际法院证据标准倾向灵活性和当事国要求确定性的意志相互协调的必然要求。
[Abstract]:In the settlement of territorial disputes, the International Court of Justice mainly adheres to the tradition of civil law system and reasonably absorbs the tradition of common law system in the standard of proof. However, because of the complexity and importance of the territorial dispute between the parties, and mainly influenced by the civil law system, the International Court of Justice usually puts the criterion of evidence superiority in the judicial practice. However, the International Court of Justice in the application of the standard there is evidence of evidence in the logic of confusion, and sometimes into a mere comparison of the weight of relevant evidence. This has aroused the international community to the International Court of Justice judicial authority certain question. Indeed, there are different voices within the International Court of Justice, whose rules of evidence are still evolving. In view of the relatively low degree of certainty of the standard of evidentiary advantage, and the over-positioning of the standard of beyond reasonable doubt, the standard of evidence of the International Court of Justice in the settlement of territorial disputes at a future stage should be defined as a "clear and convincing standard". This is also a necessary requirement of compatibility between the flexibility of the International Court of Justice's evidentiary standard and the will of the parties to demand certainty.
【作者单位】：安徽财经大学法学院;
【基金】：中国太平洋学会重大课题:东、南中国海诸岛中有争议岛屿的史地考证及相关问题研究(2200214)
【分类号】：D993.1

【共引文献】