当事国在海洋划界前的国际法义务之研析——兼论南海当事国在划界前之国际法义务

发布时间：2018-07-01 17:22

本文选题：海洋划界 + 临时安排　；参考：《法学评论》2016年06期

【摘要】：海洋划界纠纷是引发当今国际争端的最主要因素之一。《联合国海洋法公约》第74/83条第3款为当事国在海洋划界前施加了两项义务,即"尽一切努力作出实际性临时安排"的义务和"不危害或阻碍最后划界协议达成"的义务。其中,前者的实质是"善意谈判",旨在促进当事国之间订立临时安排,是一种积极义务;后者的要义则体现为"相互克制",意欲限制当事国在争议海域从事有损他方利益的单方行为和恶化现有争端的行为,属于消极义务的范畴。近年来,南海争端不断升级,为避免势态继续恶化,共谋发展,南海当事国在划界前应善意履行公约所规定的上述义务。
[Abstract]:Maritime delimitation disputes are one of the most important factors leading to international disputes today. Article 74 / 83, paragraph 3, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea imposes two obligations on the parties prior to maritime delimitation. The obligation to "make every effort to make practical interim arrangements" and the obligation "not to jeopardize or impede the conclusion of a final delimitation agreement". Among them, the essence of the former is "negotiation in good faith", aimed at promoting the conclusion of interim arrangements between the parties, which is a positive obligation; The main meaning of the latter is "mutual restraint", which is intended to restrict the unilateral acts of the parties in the disputed waters to the detriment of the interests of the other party and to worsen the existing disputes, which is a category of negative obligations. In recent years, disputes in the South China Sea have been escalating. In order to avoid further deterioration of the situation and seek common development, the parties to the South China Sea should perform the above-mentioned obligations stipulated in the Convention in good faith before delimiting the boundary.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“南海划界前临时安排的角色定位与法律实施路径研究”(15CFX070)的阶段性研究成果之一
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】