海峡两岸仲裁裁决相互认可之研究

发布时间：2018-07-05 06:39

本文选题：仲裁裁决 + 认可程序　；参考：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：目前,海峡两岸仲裁裁决的相互认可制度极不完善,相关的法律依据存在严重缺失与模糊。而随着以仲裁方式解决海峡两岸经贸纠纷的兴起,落后的相互认可制度,给两岸经贸交流造成了极大阻碍。本文主要通过对现有海峡两岸仲裁裁决相互认可制度的比较分析,指出各自不足,并提出一些完善海峡两岸仲裁裁决相互认可制度的思考。本文第一部分,通过分析仲裁裁决国籍的认定标准,结合目前两岸相关立法中对外国仲裁裁决的认定,以证明海峡两岸均未将对岸的仲裁裁决认定为外国仲裁裁决,或是认定为一般的本区域内的仲裁裁决,而是规定了特有的认可制度。本文第二部分,列举现有海峡两岸关于对岸仲裁裁决认可的直接法律依据,并依据两地区有关的司法解释或审判实践,找出可援引或可类推适用的其他法律依据。本文第三部分,在现有海峡两岸仲裁裁决相互认可法律依据下,讨论比较海峡两岸仲裁裁决的相互认可程序。本文第四部分,在1958年《纽约公约》第五条的框架下,讨论现有的海峡两岸在拒绝认可对岸仲裁裁决的理由上缺失,特别指出大陆地区因拒绝认可理由的缺失,而导致的公共秩序条款扩大适用的情况。本文第五部分,综合前四部分的比较分析,主要针对大陆地区对台仲裁裁决的认可制度,提出从理念、模式和立法上完善仲裁裁决认可制度的思考。拟提出在一个中国原则前提下,坚持以法域平等原则和友善的区际观,通过以单边自主立法为主的方式完善现有大陆地区对台仲裁裁决的拒绝认可理由,以限制公共秩序条款在对台仲裁裁决认可中的滥用。
[Abstract]:At present, the mutual recognition system of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait arbitration award is very imperfect, and the relevant legal basis is seriously lacking and vague. With the emergence of arbitration to settle cross-strait economic and trade disputes, backward mutual recognition system has caused great obstacles to cross-strait economic and trade exchanges. Through the comparative analysis of the existing cross-Strait arbitration award mutual recognition system, this paper points out their shortcomings, and puts forward some thoughts on how to perfect the cross-Strait arbitration award mutual recognition system. In the first part of this paper, by analyzing the criterion of the nationality of the arbitration award and combining with the recognition of the foreign arbitration award in the relevant legislation of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, it is proved that neither side of the Taiwan Strait has recognized the arbitration award on the other side as a foreign arbitration award. Or recognized as a general arbitration award in the region, but a specific recognition system. In the second part of this paper, the author lists the direct legal basis for the recognition of the cross-bank arbitration award by both sides of the Taiwan Strait, and finds out other legal bases that can be invoked or applied by analogy according to the relevant judicial interpretation or trial practice in the two regions. In the third part of this paper, under the existing legal basis of mutual recognition of cross-strait arbitral awards, this paper discusses the mutual recognition procedures of cross-Strait arbitral awards. The fourth part of this paper, under the framework of Article V of the 1958 New York Convention, discusses the lack of grounds for refusal of recognition of an arbitral award by the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and points out in particular the absence of grounds for refusal of recognition in mainland China. As a result of the public order provisions extended application of the situation. The fifth part of this article, synthesizes the first four parts of comparative analysis, mainly in view of the mainland region to the Taiwan arbitration award approval system, proposed from the idea, the pattern and the legislation consummates the arbitration award recognition system ponder. Under the premise of the one-China principle, we intend to adhere to the principle of equality in legal regions and the friendly inter-regional view, and to improve the existing grounds for refusing to accept Taiwan arbitration awards in the mainland by means of unilateral and autonomous legislation. To limit the abuse of public order clauses in the recognition of Taiwan arbitration awards.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.7;D997.1

【相似文献】