知识产权的权利穷竭理论研究

发布时间：2018-07-08 16:51

本文选题：知识产权 + 权利穷竭　；参考：《复旦大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着国际贸易的发展,以及知识产权国际保护的不断加强,知识产权壁垒和贸易自由化之间的矛盾日益突出。权利穷竭原则作为对知识产权的限制之一,平衡了知识产权权利人和社会公众的利益。但目前世界各国关于权利穷竭原则的理论著述与司法实践存在着很大分歧,国际社会就权利穷竭原则并没有达成一致意见,重视和研究权利穷竭原则成为迫切任务。本文试图以传统民法有关权利的基本理论以及知识产权的基本理论为切入点,并综合运用比较法等法律研究方法对权利穷竭和平行进口问题进行阐述与分析,并对我国的权利穷竭制度建设提出一定的建议。文章分为以下部分：第一部分,对知识产权的一些特点或者法律特征进行了分析,这些特征是讨论知识产权权利穷竭无法绕过的前提和基础。深入分析这些法律特征,有助厘清有关知识产权权利穷竭争议的源头。在此基础上,对权利穷竭的含义和产生原因进行了分析,并认为权利穷竭是物权对知识产权的权利限制。第二部分,分别从法理学和经济学的角度论证了权利穷竭制度的合理性。在此基础上,第三部分对权利穷竭制度的适用范围进行了分析,在分析的基础上对权利的国际穷竭原则予以了理论上的支持。与此同时,还对与权利穷竭密切相关的平行进口问题进行了分析,通过对地域性原则和进口权的分析和批判,进一步支持了权利国际穷竭在平行进口问题中的适用。第四部分,对各国的权利穷竭制度和平行进口制度进行了比较分析。以及我国现行法律规定和司法实践,并在就完善我国知识产权权利穷竭制度提出了相关的修改建议。
[Abstract]:With the development of international trade and the strengthening of international protection of intellectual property, the contradiction between intellectual property barriers and trade liberalization is becoming increasingly prominent. As one of the restrictions on intellectual property rights, the principle of exhaustion of rights balances the interests of the holders of intellectual property rights and the public. However, there are great differences between the theoretical writings and judicial practice of the principle of exhaustion of rights in the world at present. The international community has not reached an agreement on the principle of exhaustion of rights, so it is an urgent task to pay attention to and study the principle of exhaustion of rights. This paper attempts to use the basic theory of the traditional civil law and the basic theory of intellectual property as the starting point, and comprehensively use the comparative law and other legal research methods to explain and analyze the problem of exhaustion of rights and parallel import. And put forward some suggestions to the construction of the system of exhaustion of rights in our country. The article is divided into the following parts: the first part analyzes some characteristics or legal characteristics of intellectual property rights which are the premise and foundation of discussing that exhaustion of intellectual property rights can not be bypassed. An in-depth analysis of these legal features will help to clarify the source of disputes over the exhaustion of intellectual property rights. On this basis, the meaning and causes of exhaustion of rights are analyzed, and it is considered that exhaustion of rights is the restriction of rights to intellectual property rights. The second part demonstrates the rationality of the exhaustion of right system from the angle of jurisprudence and economics. On this basis, the third part analyzes the scope of application of the system of exhaustion of rights, and gives theoretical support to the principle of international exhaustion of rights on the basis of analysis. At the same time, it also analyzes the problem of parallel import which is closely related to the exhaustion of rights. By analyzing and criticizing the principle of regionalism and the right of import, it further supports the application of international exhaustion of rights in the problem of parallel import. In the fourth part, the rights exhaustion system and parallel import system are compared and analyzed. As well as the current legal provisions and judicial practice in China, and put forward some suggestions on how to perfect the exhaustion system of intellectual property rights in China.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.1;D913

【相似文献】