《联合国海洋法公约》的缺陷及中美日南海海权博弈对策比较分析

发布时间：2018-07-12 10:13

本文选题：《联合国海洋法公约》 + 南海问题　；参考：《国际观察》2016年04期

【摘要】：现行的《联合国海洋法公约》存在重大缺陷,无论从法理还是实践的视角看,都存在不公平性。南海争端的核心是领土主权争端,《联合国海洋法公约》并不适用于主权和领土争议,因此也就不适用于南海争端的处理。菲律宾对中国提出南海仲裁案的背后推手是美日等国。基于现行《联合国海洋法公约》的缺陷,为了解决南海争端,中国采取外交谈判优先的战略,美国在《联合国海洋法公约》框架外采取了以军事优势为基础的海洋威慑战略,日本则实行国际干预架构下的海洋同盟战略。采取上述不同战略的根本实质在于中美日三国围绕南海展开的海权博弈。中国应倡导南海海洋治理的两个创新性理念:以法治海、以海治海。
[Abstract]:The existing UN Convention on the Law of the Sea has major defects, which are unfair from both legal and practical perspectives. The core of the South China Sea dispute is the territorial sovereignty dispute. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea does not apply to sovereignty and territorial dispute, so it is not applicable to the South China Sea dispute. The United States and Japan are the driving force behind the Philippines' case against China in the South China Sea. Based on the shortcomings of the existing United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, in order to resolve disputes in the South China Sea, China has adopted the strategy of giving priority to diplomatic negotiations, and the United States has adopted a maritime deterrence strategy based on military superiority outside the framework of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Japan implements the strategy of maritime alliance under the framework of international intervention. The fundamental essence of adopting these different strategies lies in the sea power game between China, America and Japan around the South China Sea. China should advocate two innovative concepts of ocean governance in the South China Sea: to rule the sea and to govern the sea by sea.
【作者单位】：复旦大学日本研究中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大课题“习近平治国理念之外交战略思想研究”(项目编号:15CZD002) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“战后日本政治、外交实质和未来走向研究”(项目编号:14JZD033)的前期成果
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】