试论卡尔沃主义对国际投资立法的影响
发布时间：2018-07-17 03:22
【摘要】：19世纪60年代,伴随着资本主义国家对拉美国家的殖民投资,卡尔沃主义,作为反抗外国干涉、维护本国主权、保护本国经济的理论被首次提出。自其提出以后，广大拉美国家在其国内立法、国际投资协议中纷纷订立卡尔沃条款。卡尔沃主义，不仅在当时的拉美，甚至在世界其他国家，都具有影响力。随着国际投资的发展，，卡尔沃主义逐渐被立法实践所抛弃。然而，近年来，由于国际投资仲裁案件的突增，卡尔沃主义又有复苏之势。我国作为发展中国家，在有关国际投资的国内立法及国际条约方面存在种种不足，通过对卡尔沃主义的研究，本文试图为我国的国际投资立法的发展提供有益借鉴。 本文第一章是对卡尔沃主义的介绍。首先介绍了其产生背景及卡尔沃主义盛行的原因。然后通过对卡尔沃主义涵义的分析及同其他国际法原则的比较，来更清楚地理解19世纪60年代的卡尔沃主义。最后论述了卡尔沃主义对世界国际投资立法的影响及意义。 本文第二章，分析了卡尔沃主义诞生以后经历的兴盛、低迷、复苏三个不同阶段，对其不同阶段的时代背景、在立法司法中的不同体现以及对不同阶段的时代意义进行了分析。同时分析了不同时期各国对卡尔沃主义态度体现出的特点及其成因分析。 本文第三章，首先介绍了我国投资立法的架构及特点，然后通过对我国不同时期国内立法、国际条约的分析，阐述了卡尔沃主义在我国的发展阶段，并通过分析我国目前国际投资立法中存在的问题并结合当今卡尔沃主义复苏的趋势，对我国国际投资立法需做出的变革提出了建议。 在结论部分，作者通过对本文主要观点的小结，指出现阶段，我国立法司法实践中，不能盲目的对卡尔沃主义进行简单的否定或肯定而应当根据不同情况做出区别对待，同时应当在今后的双边投资条约的签订中，加大对我国的保护。
[Abstract]:In the 1860s, along with the capitalist countries' colonial investment in Latin American countries, Carbo doctrine was put forward for the first time as a theory of resisting foreign interference, defending one's own sovereignty and protecting one's own economy. Since it was put forward, many Latin American countries have made Carbo clauses in their domestic legislation and international investment agreements. Carbo doctrine, not only in Latin America at the time, but also in the rest of the world. With the development of international investment, Carbo doctrine has been abandoned by legislative practice. However, in recent years, due to the sudden increase of international investment arbitration cases, Carbo doctrine is recovering. China, as a developing country, has a variety of deficiencies in domestic legislation and international treaties concerning international investment. Through the study of Carbo doctrine, this paper tries to provide useful reference for the development of international investment legislation in China. The first chapter is the introduction of Carbo doctrine. First of all, it introduces the background of its emergence and the reasons for the prevalence of Carbo doctrine. Then, by analyzing the meaning of Carbo doctrine and comparing it with other principles of international law, the author makes a clearer understanding of Carbo doctrine in the 1860s. Finally, it discusses the influence and significance of Carbo doctrine on international investment legislation in the world. In the second chapter, the author analyzes three different stages of Carbo doctrine: prosperity, depression and recovery, and analyzes the background of different stages, the different embodiment in legislation and judicature, and the significance of the times in different stages. At the same time, it analyzes the characteristics and causes of different countries' attitude towards Carbo in different periods. The third chapter introduces the structure and characteristics of China's investment legislation, and then through the analysis of domestic legislation and international treaties in different periods of our country, expounds the development stage of Carbo doctrine in our country. Based on the analysis of the existing problems in China's current international investment legislation and the trend of the revival of the current Carbo doctrine, the author puts forward some suggestions for the reform of China's international investment legislation. In the conclusion part, the author points out that in the present stage, we can not blindly negate or affirm Carbo doctrine by summarizing the main viewpoints of this paper, and we should treat it differently according to different situations. At the same time, we should strengthen the protection of our country in the signing of bilateral investment treaties in the future.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.4
本文编号：2128787
[Abstract]:In the 1860s, along with the capitalist countries' colonial investment in Latin American countries, Carbo doctrine was put forward for the first time as a theory of resisting foreign interference, defending one's own sovereignty and protecting one's own economy. Since it was put forward, many Latin American countries have made Carbo clauses in their domestic legislation and international investment agreements. Carbo doctrine, not only in Latin America at the time, but also in the rest of the world. With the development of international investment, Carbo doctrine has been abandoned by legislative practice. However, in recent years, due to the sudden increase of international investment arbitration cases, Carbo doctrine is recovering. China, as a developing country, has a variety of deficiencies in domestic legislation and international treaties concerning international investment. Through the study of Carbo doctrine, this paper tries to provide useful reference for the development of international investment legislation in China. The first chapter is the introduction of Carbo doctrine. First of all, it introduces the background of its emergence and the reasons for the prevalence of Carbo doctrine. Then, by analyzing the meaning of Carbo doctrine and comparing it with other principles of international law, the author makes a clearer understanding of Carbo doctrine in the 1860s. Finally, it discusses the influence and significance of Carbo doctrine on international investment legislation in the world. In the second chapter, the author analyzes three different stages of Carbo doctrine: prosperity, depression and recovery, and analyzes the background of different stages, the different embodiment in legislation and judicature, and the significance of the times in different stages. At the same time, it analyzes the characteristics and causes of different countries' attitude towards Carbo in different periods. The third chapter introduces the structure and characteristics of China's investment legislation, and then through the analysis of domestic legislation and international treaties in different periods of our country, expounds the development stage of Carbo doctrine in our country. Based on the analysis of the existing problems in China's current international investment legislation and the trend of the revival of the current Carbo doctrine, the author puts forward some suggestions for the reform of China's international investment legislation. In the conclusion part, the author points out that in the present stage, we can not blindly negate or affirm Carbo doctrine by summarizing the main viewpoints of this paper, and we should treat it differently according to different situations. At the same time, we should strengthen the protection of our country in the signing of bilateral investment treaties in the future.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 祝海燕;;论我国双边投资条约对ICSID管辖权的接受[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
2 魏艳茹;;论我国晚近全盘接受ICSID仲裁管辖权之欠妥[J];国际经济法学刊;2006年01期
3 单文华;张生;劳志健;;“卡尔沃主义”死了吗[J];国际经济法学刊;2008年02期
4 王春婕;;卡尔沃主义的“复苏”及其对我国的启示[J];理论学刊;2006年12期
5 杜萱;;试析用尽当地救济规则在国际投资法中的适用[J];青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年03期
6 单文华;张生;;从“南北矛盾”到“公私冲突”:卡尔沃主义的复苏与国际投资法的新视野[J];西安交通大学学报(社会科学版);2008年04期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 殷敏;外交保护法律制度及其发展势态[D];华东政法大学;2007年
2 刘京莲;阿根廷国际投资仲裁危机的法理与实践研究[D];厦门大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 郑佳;论用尽当地救济原则[D];西南政法大学;2008年
本文编号：2128787
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2128787.html
