ICSID中“法庭之友”问题研究

发布时间：2018-07-18 12:17

【摘要】：经济全球趋势使得国际直接投资剧增,随之而来的投资者和东道国之间的争端频发。投资者畏于东道国政府,多半不愿意在东道国境内法院解决纠纷,转而诉诸于国际投资仲裁机构。随着国际投资仲裁不断发展,国际社会又逐渐开始质疑国际投资仲裁的合法性和合理性,其中不乏仲裁规则、仲裁庭组成等等方面的问题。为了调和国际社会的质疑声,"法庭之友"逐渐出现在国际投资仲裁中。"法庭之友"的加入从一定程度上改善了国际投资仲裁的弊端,但这一制度在国际投资仲裁中的发展还存在着很多问题。本文选择了国际投资仲裁中具有代表性的ICSID仲裁,谈一谈ICSID仲裁中的"法庭之友"问题。本文共分为五个部分。第一部分介绍了"法庭之友"的基本理论,并且总结了 ICSID中"法庭之友"的演进历程。第二部分讨论ICSID中"法庭之友"主体的界定问题。从仲裁案例出发分析"法庭之友"的主体形式条件,从仲裁规则看"法庭之友"的主体实质条件,提出ICSID对于"法庭之友"主体规定的不足。第三部分讨论国际社会一直热议的"法庭之友"与仲裁秘密性相冲突的问题。从ICSID仲裁秘密性的原则以及提高透明度的现实需要出发,提出在发展"法庭之友"制度时要充分平衡参与度和秘密性。第四部分讨论《华盛顿公约》发展中国家对"法庭之友"制度的参与度问题。分析发展中国家拒绝这一制度的原因,并且分析发展中国家需要发展"法庭之友"的客观需要。最后一部分,则是针对本文讨论的三个问题,提出完善ICSID中"法庭之友"的建议,以期ICSID仲裁朝着更合理、合法、公平的方向发展,最后着重讨论我国对ICSID "法庭之友"的参与立场和未来的发展方向。
[Abstract]:The global economic trend has led to a sharp increase in international direct investment, resulting in frequent disputes between investors and host countries. Fearful of host governments, investors are mostly reluctant to settle disputes in the host country's courts and resort to international investment arbitration institutions. With the continuous development of international investment arbitration, the international community gradually began to question the legitimacy and rationality of international investment arbitration, including arbitration rules, constitution of arbitration tribunal and so on. Amicus curiae has gradually emerged in international investment arbitration in an effort to reconcile the international community's scepticism. " The addition of amicus curiae has improved the malpractice of international investment arbitration to a certain extent, but there are still many problems in the development of this system in international investment arbitration. In this paper, the representative ICSID arbitration in international investment arbitration is chosen to discuss the amicus curiae in ICSID arbitration. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part introduces the basic theory of amicus curiae and summarizes the evolution of amicus curiae in ICSID. The second part discusses the definition of amicus curiae in ICSID. This paper analyzes the subject form conditions of amicus curiae from the arbitration case, looks at the substantive conditions of the subject of amicus curiae from the arbitration rules, and puts forward the deficiency of ICSID for the subject provision of amicus curiae. The third part discusses the conflict between amicus curiae and arbitration secrecy. Based on the principle of confidentiality of ICSID arbitration and the practical need to improve transparency, the author puts forward that the participation and secrecy should be fully balanced in the development of amicus curiae system. The fourth part discusses the participation of developing countries in amicus curiae system. Analyze the reasons why developing countries reject this system and analyze the objective needs of developing countries to develop amicus curiae. In the last part, aiming at the three problems discussed in this paper, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the "amicus curiae" in ICSID, in order to make ICSID arbitration more reasonable, legal and fair. Finally, the paper mainly discusses our country's participation in ICSID amicus curiae and its future development direction.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D996.4

【相似文献】