论国际商事仲裁内部上诉机制

发布时间：2018-07-21 16:10

【摘要】：20世纪以来,随着商事贸易的全球化发展,每年都有大量国际贸易纠纷被提交到国际商事仲裁机构,商事仲裁已经成为解决国际贸易争端的主要方式。商事仲裁一直以来奉行“一裁终裁”的审理原则,仲裁裁决一经仲裁庭作出,即产生法律效力,国际商事仲裁也不例外。但随着国际商事贸易的发展,“一裁终裁”制度已不能满足国际商事仲裁当事人的需要。在国际商事仲裁过程中,由独任仲裁员或多名仲裁员作出的仲裁裁决也会出现实体或程序方面的错误,这种情况下,当事人只有一种救济途径,即向内国法院申请司法审查监督,但是,出于对仲裁制度独立性的尊重,国际公约及各国国内立法均规定仲裁裁决的司法审查范围限于程序方面的审查,所以国际商事仲裁裁决的实体错误将无法得到救济。在实践中,裁决司法审查制度还暴露出愈来愈多的其他问题,并且无法通过制度上的完善来解决该问题,因此,国内外一些学者要求建立一种新的制度,即选择适用的国际商事仲裁内部上诉机制,来解决仲裁裁决的救济和执行问题。本文主要采用理论结合实践的方法,首先分析研究国际商事仲裁的外部救济的弊端、仲裁上诉机制的理论基础,其次对仲裁内部上诉机制在商品仲裁中的运用和内部上诉机制在一般国际商事仲裁中的推广运用予以介绍和分析,得出建立一般国际商事仲裁上诉机制的必要性与可行性,最后对一般国际商事仲裁内部上诉机制的构建提出建议,以期为国际商事仲裁建立内部上诉机制提供借鉴。本文对国际商事仲裁内部上诉机制的研究,内容主要包括以下五个部分:第一部分,绪论。主要介绍国际商事仲裁内部上诉机制的概念、本文研究目的及国内外有关上诉机制的研究现状。第二部分,国际商事仲裁外部救济措施的弊端。这部分内容主要通过国际条约及国内立法的规定分析现有的国际商事仲裁外部救济措施及其弊端,如国际商事仲裁司法审查范围的有限、审查效力的不确定、与商事仲裁的不相容等。第三部分,国际商事仲裁内部上诉机制的理论基础。这部分内容主要从理论基础的角度论证国际商事仲裁内部上诉机制的建立符合意思自治原则及公平和效率原则。第四部分,内部上诉机制在国际商事仲裁中的实践运用。此部分主要通过分析国际行业协会仲裁机构及其他采用上诉机制的仲裁机构(如ICSID)的仲裁规则、采用内部上诉机制的原因及推广运用于一般国际商事仲裁的可行性,从实践的角度论证国际商事仲裁上诉机制的可行性。第五部分,国际商事仲裁内部上诉机制构建。仲裁内部上诉机制的构建可以借鉴国际上已有的先例,,这部分内容主要通过参考和借鉴商品仲裁内部上诉机制,对一般国际商事仲裁上诉机制的构建提出建议。第六部分,结论。这部分内容是对全文的总结。
[Abstract]:Since the 20th century, with the development of commercial trade globalization, a large number of international trade disputes have been submitted to international commercial arbitration institutions every year. Commercial arbitration has become the main way to solve international trade disputes. Commercial arbitration has always followed the principle of "one final adjudication". Once the arbitral tribunal has made an arbitral award, it will have legal effect, and international commercial arbitration is no exception. However, with the development of international commercial trade, the final adjudication system can not meet the needs of the parties to international commercial arbitration. In the course of international commercial arbitration, there are also substantive or procedural errors in the arbitral award made by a single arbitrator or arbitrators, in which case the parties have only one remedy, That is, to apply to domestic courts for judicial review supervision, but, out of respect for the independence of the arbitration system, international conventions and national legislation stipulate that the scope of judicial review of arbitral awards is limited to procedural review, Therefore, the substantive error of the international commercial arbitration award will not be remedied. In practice, the judicial review system of adjudication also exposes more and more other problems, and can not be solved by perfecting the system. Therefore, some scholars at home and abroad demand the establishment of a new system. That is to choose the applicable internal appeal mechanism of international commercial arbitration to solve the problem of relief and enforcement of arbitration award. This paper mainly adopts the method of combining theory with practice. Firstly, it analyzes and studies the malpractice of the external remedy of international commercial arbitration, and the theoretical basis of arbitration appeal mechanism. Secondly, it introduces and analyzes the application of internal appeal mechanism in commodity arbitration and the promotion and application of internal appeal mechanism in general international commercial arbitration, and concludes the necessity and feasibility of establishing appeal mechanism of general international commercial arbitration. Finally, some suggestions on the construction of internal appeal mechanism of international commercial arbitration are put forward in order to provide reference for the establishment of internal appeal mechanism in international commercial arbitration. This paper studies the internal appeal mechanism of international commercial arbitration, including the following five parts: the first part, introduction. This paper mainly introduces the concept of the internal appeal mechanism of international commercial arbitration, the purpose of this paper and the current situation of the research on the appeal mechanism at home and abroad. The second part, the malpractice of external remedy measures of international commercial arbitration. This part mainly through the international treaties and the provisions of domestic legislation to analyze the existing international commercial arbitration external relief measures and their drawbacks, such as the limited scope of judicial review of international commercial arbitration, the effectiveness of the review of uncertainty, Incompatibility with commercial arbitration, etc. The third part is the theoretical basis of the internal appeal mechanism of international commercial arbitration. This part mainly demonstrates that the establishment of internal appeal mechanism of international commercial arbitration conforms to the principle of autonomy of will and the principle of fairness and efficiency from the angle of theoretical basis. The fourth part, the application of internal appeal mechanism in international commercial arbitration. This part mainly analyzes the arbitration rules of international trade association arbitration institutions and other arbitration institutions using appeal mechanism (such as ICSID), the reasons for adopting internal appeal mechanism and the feasibility of popularizing it in general international commercial arbitration. The feasibility of the appeal mechanism of international commercial arbitration is demonstrated from the point of view of practice. The fifth part, the international commercial arbitration internal appeal mechanism construction. The construction of the internal appeal mechanism of arbitration can draw lessons from the international precedents. This part of the content mainly through reference and reference to the internal appeal mechanism of commodity arbitration, to the general international commercial arbitration appeal mechanism of the construction of suggestions. The sixth part, conclusion. This part is a summary of the full text.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D997.4

【相似文献】