国际经济法中“3D打

发布时间：2018-08-07 16:45

【摘要】："3D打印"突破了当前WTO项下"货物"与"服务"二分法的藩篱,难以纳入当前GATT、GATS的管辖范围,由此带来了国际经济法中一个非常特殊的法律问题。2015年美国联邦巡回上诉法院判称ITC对3D打印数据无管辖权的裁决可能会对3D打印技术以及从美国境外传送至美国的数字数据产生重大影响。管理数字技术更高效的法治是在区域或多边贸易协定层面。ACTA、ITA、TISA及TPP等贸易协定无论是已签署生效还是正在谈判缔结,均为规制"3D打印"等数字贸易提供了新的路径和更具体、更完善的条约体系鉴于数字贸易前所未有的特性和WTO条约体系现有文本的局限,采取独立型诸边数字贸易协定更为适宜。
[Abstract]:"3D printing" breaks through the barrier of the dichotomy of "goods" and "services" under the current WTO, and is difficult to be brought into the jurisdiction of the current WTO. This raises a very special legal issue in international economic law. In 2015, the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit ruled that ITC's decision to have no jurisdiction over 3D printing data could have implications for 3D printing technology and for transmission to the United States from outside the United States. The country's digital data have a significant impact. The more efficient rule of law in the management of digital technology is that trade agreements, such as regional or multilateral trade agreements, such as regional or multilateral trade agreements, such as the Agreement, whether signed or under negotiation, provide a new and more specific way to regulate digital trade such as "3D printing". In view of the unprecedented characteristics of digital trade and the limitations of the existing texts of the WTO treaty system, a more complete treaty system is more appropriate to adopt an independent plurilateral digital trade agreement.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金2016年一般项目“TPP环境章节文本分析及我国法律对策研究”(项目编号:16BFX04) 教育部2015年青年基金项目“区域碳交易法律制度研究”(项目编号:15YJC820084) 江苏高校优势学科建设项目(PPAD) 江苏高校区域法治发展协同创新中心项目“全球化下自由贸易协定文本研究”(项目编号:FZXDH2014003)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D996

【相似文献】