间接征收与我国海外投资利益保障探究

发布时间：2018-08-09 07:45

【摘要】：随着各国对待外资态度的转变,国际投资领域对直接征收问题的激烈争论逐渐消退,取而代之的是对间接征收的讨论。由于间接征收与国家管理权无明确界限,所以争议焦点集中在间接征收的界定和由此引发的补偿标准问题上。近几年,我国海外投资蓬勃发展,但由于对间接征收问题认识不够,导致我国海外投资者利益遭受较大损失。本文通过对涉及间接征收的理论、法律法规及仲裁判例的分析和研究,对间接征收界定和补偿标准提出几点看法,并针对我国双边投资条约和海外投资法中存在的间接征收问题提出一些完善建议。本文除引言和结语外共分三章,全文约三万五千字。第一章阐述间接征收的传统理论。首先,论述直接征收到间接征收的变迁和间接征收的表现形式。其次,对上世纪南北国家围绕间接征收提出的理论进行归纳,指出间接征收的传统争议实质为南北国家利益的博弈。第二章论述间接征收的新争议焦点。首先,对间接征收的界定争议进行论述,分析了法律学说、国际条约及国内法、仲裁判例对间接征收的界定标准,得出采用“效果与目的兼采标准”并结合“国家管理权例外条款”及“比例原则”综合界定的结论。其次,论述了间接征收的补偿标准争议,通过对司法实践和法律学说的分析,得出应分别对合法间接征收和非法间接征收采用不同补偿标准以确保公平的结论。第三章是本文核心部分,分析我国海外投资法律体系中存在的间接征收隐忧并提出完善措施。首先,从国际法和国内法两个层面,指出我国海外投资法律体系存在的间接征收问题。其次,对我国海外投资法律体系提出完善措施,包括:完善我国双边投资条约的措施,如增强双边投资条约的导向性、明确间接征收定义及界定标准、设置统一争端解决条款、增设间接征收补偿条款和国家管理权例外条款;完善我国海外投资国内法的措施,如建立健全海外投资监管机制、信息服务机制和海外投资保险机制。笔者希望通过本文的论述,能使我国海外投资者免遭间接征收之侵,在最大程度上保障我国海外投资利益,为我国海外投资的发展壮大尽绵薄之力。
[Abstract]:With the change of attitude towards foreign investment, the heated debate on direct expropriation in the field of international investment gradually dissipates, and is replaced by the discussion of indirect levy. Since there is no clear boundary between indirect expropriation and national administrative power, the controversy focuses on the definition of indirect expropriation and the compensation standard caused by it. In recent years, China's overseas investment has developed vigorously, but because of the lack of understanding of indirect expropriation, the interests of overseas investors in our country have suffered a great loss. Through the analysis and study of the theory, laws and regulations and arbitration cases involving indirect expropriation, this paper puts forward some views on the definition of indirect expropriation and the standard of compensation. Some suggestions on indirect expropriation in bilateral investment treaties and overseas investment law are put forward. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into three chapters, the full text is about 35000 words. The first chapter expounds the traditional theory of indirect expropriation. First of all, it discusses the vicissitude from direct expropriation to indirect expropriation and the manifestation of indirect expropriation. Secondly, the author sums up the theory of indirect expropriation in the last century, and points out that the traditional dispute of indirect expropriation is essentially the game of the national interests of the north and south. The second chapter discusses the new controversy focus of indirect expropriation. First of all, it discusses the definition dispute of indirect expropriation, analyzes the legal theory, international treaties and domestic law, the definition standard of indirect expropriation in arbitration case. The conclusion is that the criterion of effect and purpose is adopted, combined with the exception clause of national management power and the principle of proportionality. Secondly, the paper discusses the dispute of compensation standard of indirect expropriation, and through the analysis of judicial practice and legal theory, draws the conclusion that different compensation standards should be adopted to ensure fairness between legal indirect expropriation and illegal indirect expropriation. The third chapter is the core part of this article, analyzes the indirect expropriation hidden worries in our country's overseas investment legal system and puts forward the perfect measures. First of all, from the two aspects of international law and domestic law, this paper points out the indirect expropriation problem in the legal system of overseas investment in China. Secondly, put forward the perfect measures to our country's overseas investment legal system, including: perfect our country's bilateral investment treaty measures, such as enhancing the orientation of the bilateral investment treaty, clarifying the definition and standard of indirect expropriation, setting up the unified dispute settlement clause. The measures of perfecting our country's domestic law of overseas investment, such as establishing and perfecting the supervision mechanism of overseas investment, information service mechanism and overseas investment insurance mechanism, are added. The author hopes that through the discussion of this article, China's overseas investors can avoid the invasion of indirect expropriation, protect the interests of our country's overseas investment to the greatest extent, and do their utmost for the development and expansion of our country's overseas investment.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.4

【相似文献】