论美国对国际刑事法院的政策

发布时间：2018-08-09 08:21

【摘要】：基于对国际刑事法院成立和发展特点的概述(包括"相同观点国家"集团与美国的博弈),本文将美国克林顿、小布什和奥巴马民主、共和两党三届政府对国际刑事法院的政策演变进行了比较与解析。作者认为,应关注美国三届政府近20年来始终未变的两大"政策核心":即通过联合国安理会对国际刑事法院进行控制和干预,以及要求国际刑事法院给予所有美国人"司法豁免权"。从美国全球战略与国家利益出发,需要时在世界上使用武力则是以上两大"政策核心"的基本前提。它们将继续影响美国对国际刑事法院的政策,并使美国在近期(特别是在世界热点地区出现突发事件时)与中长期(预期2017年《罗马规约侵略罪修正案》批准生效后)存在着与国际刑事法院发生新的矛盾冲突的可能性。
[Abstract]:Based on an overview of the characteristics of the establishment and development of the International Criminal Court (including the game between the "like-minded States" group and the United States), this paper presents Clinton, Bush Jr., and Obama's democracy in the United States. The policy evolution of the ICC has been compared and analyzed by the three-term Republican government. The author holds that the two "core policies" that have remained unchanged in the last 20 years under the three administrations of the United States should be paid close attention to, namely, the control and intervention of the International Criminal Court through the United Nations Security Council. And asking the International Criminal Court to grant "judicial immunity" to all Americans. From the perspective of American global strategy and national interests, the use of force in the world when needed is the basic premise of the above two "policy cores". They will continue to influence United States policy towards the International Criminal Court, It also makes it possible for the United States to have a new conflict with the International Criminal Court in the near future (especially in the event of emergencies in hot spots of the world) and in the medium and long term (after the ratification of the Rome Statute Amendment to the Rome Statute is expected to come into force in 2017).
【作者单位】：美国乔治·华盛顿大学;
【分类号】：D997.9

【参考文献】