国际投资法中的公平与公正待遇标准研究：趋势及对策
发布时间：2018-08-13 14:56
【摘要】：公平与公正待遇标准自被创设以来,经过多年的发展,已经成为投资者保护领域最为重要的标准之一。公平与公正待遇标准作为一个绝对标准,给予了投资者高标准的保护。与公平与公正待遇条款无处不在形成鲜明对照的是该标准的不确定性。迄今为止,国际社会在该准的内涵上仍然没有达成一致意见。目前对公平与公正待遇标准的理解主要依赖投资条约条文的模糊规定以及仲裁庭的仲裁裁定。这些条约和裁定各执一词,给东道国和投资者带来了极大地不确定性,阻碍了国际投资的平稳发展。只有一个内涵明确的公平与公正待遇标准,才能更好地促进国际资本的流动。 除去导言和结论,本文被分为四个部分。第一章是公平与公正待遇标准的起源和发展。本章介绍了公平与公正待遇标准在多变和双边领域的立法情况,为后文的深入论述提供了背景分析。第二章是公平与公正待遇标准的解释问题。笔者认为公平与公正待遇条款的模糊性措辞是产生解释争议的根源。本章还对公平与公正待遇和最低标准待遇的内容进行了比较分析,厘清了两者的关系。第三章是公平与公正待遇标准的扩大化解释。本章归纳了晚近仲裁庭适用较多的合法预期、稳定性和透明度等要素,并指出了扩大化解释的不合理性,明确了公平与公正待遇标准的正确定位。第四章是中国的公平与公正待遇立法及其完善。本章分析了目前中国投资协定中有关公平与公正待遇立法的不足,并给出了完善的建议。
[Abstract]:After years of development, fair and just treatment standards have become one of the most important standards in the field of investor protection. As an absolute standard, the standard of fair and just treatment gives investors a high standard of protection. In stark contrast to the pervasive fairness and fair treatment clause is the uncertainty of the standard. So far, the international community has not reached agreement on the meaning of the proposal. The current understanding of fair and equitable treatment standards mainly depends on the vague provisions of investment treaties and arbitration decisions of the arbitral tribunal. These treaties and rulings are consistent, bringing great uncertainty to host countries and investors, and hindering the smooth development of international investment. Only a clear standard of fair and just treatment can better promote the flow of international capital. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts. The first chapter is the origin and development of fair and just treatment standards. This chapter introduces the legislation of the standard of fair and just treatment in the changeable and bilateral fields, and provides the background analysis for the further discussion. The second chapter is the explanation of fair and just treatment standard. The author thinks that the ambiguous wording of fair and just treatment clause is the root of interpretation controversy. This chapter also analyzes the content of fair and just treatment and minimum standard treatment, and clarifies the relationship between them. The third chapter is the expansion explanation of fair and just treatment standard. This chapter sums up the legal expectation, stability and transparency of the recent arbitration tribunal, points out the irrationality of the expanded interpretation, and clarifies the correct orientation of the fair and just treatment standard. The fourth chapter is the legislation and perfection of fair and just treatment in China. This chapter analyzes the shortcomings of the legislation on fair and just treatment in China's investment agreements, and gives some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.4
本文编号：2181323
[Abstract]:After years of development, fair and just treatment standards have become one of the most important standards in the field of investor protection. As an absolute standard, the standard of fair and just treatment gives investors a high standard of protection. In stark contrast to the pervasive fairness and fair treatment clause is the uncertainty of the standard. So far, the international community has not reached agreement on the meaning of the proposal. The current understanding of fair and equitable treatment standards mainly depends on the vague provisions of investment treaties and arbitration decisions of the arbitral tribunal. These treaties and rulings are consistent, bringing great uncertainty to host countries and investors, and hindering the smooth development of international investment. Only a clear standard of fair and just treatment can better promote the flow of international capital. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts. The first chapter is the origin and development of fair and just treatment standards. This chapter introduces the legislation of the standard of fair and just treatment in the changeable and bilateral fields, and provides the background analysis for the further discussion. The second chapter is the explanation of fair and just treatment standard. The author thinks that the ambiguous wording of fair and just treatment clause is the root of interpretation controversy. This chapter also analyzes the content of fair and just treatment and minimum standard treatment, and clarifies the relationship between them. The third chapter is the expansion explanation of fair and just treatment standard. This chapter sums up the legal expectation, stability and transparency of the recent arbitration tribunal, points out the irrationality of the expanded interpretation, and clarifies the correct orientation of the fair and just treatment standard. The fourth chapter is the legislation and perfection of fair and just treatment in China. This chapter analyzes the shortcomings of the legislation on fair and just treatment in China's investment agreements, and gives some suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D996.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 苏如飞;;中外双边投资协定中的公正公平待遇条款探析[J];西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
2 邓婷婷;;外资公平与公正待遇与国际最低待遇标准[J];湖南社会科学;2009年06期
3 余劲松;外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J];法商研究;2005年06期
4 刘笋;;论国际投资仲裁对国家主权的挑战——兼评美国的应对之策及其启示[J];法商研究;2008年03期
5 徐崇利;;公平与公正待遇:真义之解读[J];法商研究;2010年03期
6 余劲松;梁丹妮;;公平公正待遇的最新发展动向及我国的对策[J];法学家;2007年06期
7 万双龙;;公平与公正待遇:我国的缔约现状与风险应对策略[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2010年10期
8 徐崇利;;公平与公正待遇标准:国际投资法中的“帝王条款”?[J];现代法学;2008年05期
，本文编号：2181323
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2181323.html
