不方便法院原则在我国的适用研究
发布时间：2018-08-13 15:31
【摘要】：不方便法院原则(Doctrine of Forum Non Convenience)作为平衡宽泛管辖权的工具广泛应用于英美法系国家,其有效地解决了法院的案件积压问题,平衡了当事人的权益,但其过于灵活的适用方式也为部分大陆法系国家所不能接受。但随着经济全球化,其作为缓和国际民商事管辖权冲突的一种有效手段,正被越来越多的国家与地区所接受。虽然我国对于是否引入该原则一直存在着分歧,我国各地方法院和最高人民法院适用该原则的判例已然为我国引入不方便法院原则提供了实践基础。本文将通过介绍不方便法院原则产生、发展的过程,以揭示其存在的意义与价值,并对几种主要的不方便法院原则模式进行分析、比较,为我国不方便法院原则制度的构建提供几点浅陋见解。 本文正文部分分为四章。 第一章对不方便法院原则的概念以及其在各国产生、发展的历史过程进行介绍。通过对该原则在两大法系存在形式的阐述,指出各模式中可供借鉴之处。 第二章对不方便法院原则的最新发展进行了探讨。在制定有关国际民商事管辖权公约时各国对于不方便法院原则的争论,以及美国最近对不方便法院原则适用作出的改变都对不方便法院原则被更多国家接受产生了较大影响。 第三章主要对我国适用不方便法院原则的利弊进行了分析,并对我国已颁布的相关政策以及已判决的案例进行了总结。 第四章将在对各国不方便法院原则制度比较分析的基础上,对我国不方便法院原则制度的设计提出建议。
[Abstract]:The inconvenient Court principle (Doctrine of Forum Non Convenience), as a tool to balance broad jurisdiction, is widely used in common law countries. It effectively solves the backlog of court cases and balances the rights and interests of the parties. But its too flexible way of application is also unacceptable to some civil law countries. However, with the economic globalization, as an effective means to ease the conflict of international civil and commercial jurisdiction, it is accepted by more and more countries and regions. Although there have been differences on whether to introduce the principle in our country, the jurisprudence of the local courts and the Supreme people's Court has already provided a practical basis for the introduction of the inconvenient court principle in our country. In this paper, the author will introduce the process of the emergence and development of the inconvenient court principle to reveal the significance and value of its existence, and analyze and compare several main modes of the inconvenient court principle. It provides some humble views for the construction of inconvenient court principle system in our country. The text of this paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the concept of the inconvenient court principle and its historical process of emergence and development in various countries. By expounding the existence form of this principle in the two legal systems, the author points out that the models can be used for reference. The second chapter discusses the latest development of the inconvenient court principle. In formulating the convention on international civil and commercial jurisdiction, the controversy over the principle of inconvenient courts in various countries and the recent changes in the application of the principle of inconvenient courts in the United States have had a great impact on the acceptance of the principle of inconvenient courts by more countries. The third chapter mainly analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of applying the inconvenient court principle in our country, and summarizes the relevant policies and cases that have been issued in our country. On the basis of the comparative analysis of the principle system of inconvenient courts in various countries, the fourth chapter puts forward some suggestions on the design of the principle system of inconvenient courts in our country.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997;D925.1
本文编号：2181400
[Abstract]:The inconvenient Court principle (Doctrine of Forum Non Convenience), as a tool to balance broad jurisdiction, is widely used in common law countries. It effectively solves the backlog of court cases and balances the rights and interests of the parties. But its too flexible way of application is also unacceptable to some civil law countries. However, with the economic globalization, as an effective means to ease the conflict of international civil and commercial jurisdiction, it is accepted by more and more countries and regions. Although there have been differences on whether to introduce the principle in our country, the jurisprudence of the local courts and the Supreme people's Court has already provided a practical basis for the introduction of the inconvenient court principle in our country. In this paper, the author will introduce the process of the emergence and development of the inconvenient court principle to reveal the significance and value of its existence, and analyze and compare several main modes of the inconvenient court principle. It provides some humble views for the construction of inconvenient court principle system in our country. The text of this paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the concept of the inconvenient court principle and its historical process of emergence and development in various countries. By expounding the existence form of this principle in the two legal systems, the author points out that the models can be used for reference. The second chapter discusses the latest development of the inconvenient court principle. In formulating the convention on international civil and commercial jurisdiction, the controversy over the principle of inconvenient courts in various countries and the recent changes in the application of the principle of inconvenient courts in the United States have had a great impact on the acceptance of the principle of inconvenient courts by more countries. The third chapter mainly analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of applying the inconvenient court principle in our country, and summarizes the relevant policies and cases that have been issued in our country. On the basis of the comparative analysis of the principle system of inconvenient courts in various countries, the fourth chapter puts forward some suggestions on the design of the principle system of inconvenient courts in our country.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997;D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 张淑钿;;香港不方便法院原则的实践及对内地的启示[J];法律适用;2009年08期
2 徐伟功;;我国不宜采用不方便法院原则——以不方便法院原则的运作环境与功能为视角[J];法学评论;2006年01期
3 宋建立;;从中化国际案看不方便法院原则的最新发展——兼论我国区际民商事诉讼管辖权冲突的若干思考[J];法学评论;2007年06期
4 徐伟功;;美国国际民事管辖权中的两大阀门——不方便法院原则与禁诉命令[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2006年02期
5 徐伟功;试析《魁北克民法典》第3135条关于不方便法院原则的规定[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2002年06期
6 张建;肖进中;;不方便法院原则在涉港澳台民商事案件中适用的必要性[J];和田师范专科学校学报;2007年04期
7 徐伟功;简析国际民事管辖权中的不方便法院原则[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2003年04期
8 徐伟功;;美国不方便法院原则的典型判例评析[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2009年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 史展;不方便法院原则在中国的适用[D];苏州大学;2008年
2 邹丽俐;在我国引入不方便法院原则的相关问题研究[D];厦门大学;2009年
3 董是强;论中国的不方便法院原则之借鉴与构建[D];厦门大学;2009年
，本文编号：2181400
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2181400.html
