当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

论被撤销的国际商事仲裁裁决及其承认与执行

发布时间:2018-08-14 19:18
【摘要】:仲裁作为一种独立于诉讼外的纠纷解决方式,其具有的自治性特点决定了其必然要受到国家的司法监督,而撤销仲裁裁决制度便是司法对仲裁进行监督的一种重要方式。因为国际商事仲裁涉及到不同国家之间的关系,而各国对于撤销仲裁裁决的理由规定各不相同,对于被撤销的仲裁裁决的效力认定的标准和依据也存在差异。因此,现实中就出现了一些国家对已经被仲裁裁决地国家撤销的国际商事仲裁进行承认及执行。 按照传统的仲裁理论来看,,因为仲裁裁决的效力是依附于某个国家特定的法律体系内,一项仲裁裁决若是被裁决作出地国家的法律所撤销,那该项仲裁裁决的效力就不复存在,不能再获得承认及执行。然而,实践中出现的对已经被仲裁裁决作出地国家撤销的仲裁裁决的承认及执行案例,使得传统的仲裁理论受到了挑战,由此引发了学界对“已经被撤销的国际商事仲裁裁决是否还具有可行性”问题的争论。本文主要是从理论,实践以及结合我国的相关立法来对此问题进行探讨。 本文共包括四个章节,第一章是对国际商事仲裁裁决撤销制度的简述,简要论述了国际商事仲裁裁决的国籍、撤销国际商事仲裁裁决的含义、国际上对撤销商事仲裁裁决的相关立法以及对国际商事仲裁裁决撤销权归属问题的分析等,为本文做好理论铺垫。第二章主要是通过对国际商事仲裁裁决制度的存废之争以及在国际商事仲裁中撤销仲裁裁决制度和承认与执行制度的不同来阐述国际商事仲裁裁决撤销制度的意义。第三章为承认及执行被撤销的国际商事仲裁裁决的实践和其理论之争。首先是对法国、美国执行已经被撤销的国际商事仲裁裁决的案例进行探讨,其次是总结分析学界对承认及执行被撤销的国际商事仲裁裁决的理论之争,然后提出自己对该问题的认识以及我国的态度。第四章通过分析我国在撤销涉外仲裁中的撤销事由的规定、审理撤销仲裁裁决案件的程序、撤销的法律后果等方面的立法现状,提出一些对完善我国撤销涉外仲裁裁决制度的建议。
[Abstract]:Arbitration, as a kind of dispute settlement method independent of litigation, has the autonomy characteristic that it must be subject to the judicial supervision of the country. The annulment of arbitration award system is an important way for judicial supervision of arbitration. Because the international commercial arbitration involves the relations between different countries, the different countries have different provisions on the reasons for setting aside the arbitral award, and the standards and bases for the determination of the validity of the set aside arbitral award are also different. Therefore, in reality, some countries recognize and enforce the international commercial arbitration which has been revoked by the country where the arbitral award is made. According to traditional arbitration theory, because the effect of an arbitral award is attached to a specific legal system of a country, if an arbitral award is set aside by the law of the country where the award is made, the validity of the arbitral award ceases to exist. Can no longer be recognized and enforced. However, the traditional arbitration theory is challenged by the cases of recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award which has been revoked by the country where the arbitral award has been made. This led to a debate about whether the annulled international commercial arbitration award is feasible or not. This article is mainly from the theory, the practice and the union our country related legislation to carry on the discussion to this question. The first chapter is a brief description of the annulment system of international commercial arbitration awards, briefly discusses the nationality of international commercial arbitration awards, the meaning of annulment of international commercial arbitration awards. The international legislation on annulment of commercial arbitration award and the analysis of the attribution of revocation right of international commercial arbitration award pave the way for the theory of this paper. The second chapter mainly expounds the significance of the annulment system of international commercial arbitration award through the argument of the existence and abrogation of the system of international commercial arbitration award and the difference between the system of annulment of arbitral award and the system of recognition and enforcement in international commercial arbitration. The third chapter is about the practice of recognition and enforcement of annulled international commercial arbitration award and its theoretical controversy. The first is to discuss the cases of France and the United States enforcing the revoked international commercial arbitration awards, and the second is to summarize and analyze the academic theories about the recognition and enforcement of revoked international commercial arbitration awards. Then put forward their own understanding of the problem and our attitude. The fourth chapter analyzes the current legislative situation of our country in the aspects of revocation of foreign arbitration, the procedure of hearing the case of annulment of arbitration award, the legal consequences of revocation, and so on. Some suggestions are put forward to perfect the system of annulment of foreign arbitration award in China.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D997.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈安;论中国涉外仲裁的监督机制及其与国际惯例的接轨[J];比较法研究;1995年04期

2 谢新胜;;论争中的已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决之承认与执行[J];北京仲裁;2007年03期

3 李沣桦;;已撤销商事仲裁裁决之承认与执行实证研究——以Chromalloy案为例对《纽约公约》的适用分析[J];北京仲裁;2008年03期

4 赵秀文;从克罗马罗依案看国际仲裁裁决的撤销与执行[J];法商研究;2002年05期

5 肖永平;也谈我国法院对仲裁的监督范围——与陈安先生商榷[J];法学评论;1998年01期

6 刘维民;;关于我国仲裁涉外裁决撤销制度的研究[J];当代经济;2007年09期

7 ;最高人民法院关于当事人对人民法院撤销仲裁裁决的裁定不服申请再审人民法院是否受理问题的批复[J];中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报;1999年02期

8 王秀玲;我国涉外仲裁的司法审查及其修改与完善[J];河北法学;2005年05期

9 赵秀文;论国际商事仲裁裁决的国籍及其撤销的理论与实践[J];法制与社会发展;2002年01期

10 张志军;张琪玮;;我国涉外仲裁司法审查制度探析[J];山东审判(山东法官培训学院学报);2006年03期

相关硕士学位论文 前9条

1 栾海萍;已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决的域外效力研究[D];辽宁大学;2011年

2 江仁所;论已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决的承认和执行[D];华东政法学院;2005年

3 杨楠;国际商事仲裁裁决的撤销权归属问题探析[D];中国政法大学;2006年

4 刘云甫;论国际商事仲裁裁决的撤销[D];广东外语外贸大学;2006年

5 王唯骏;我国仲裁裁决撤销司法审查制度研究[D];华东政法学院;2005年

6 周国杰;论承认与执行已撤销国际商事仲裁裁决[D];中国政法大学;2007年

7 朱挺;论撤销仲裁裁决司法审查不当的救济制度[D];上海交通大学;2007年

8 马雪英;论我国涉外仲裁裁决的撤销制度[D];中国政法大学;2009年

9 程永强;论被撤销外国仲裁裁决的承认与执行[D];厦门大学;2009年



本文编号:2183863

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2183863.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f70bf***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com