战争罪国际法问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-17 19:28
【摘要】：作为国际法上最为严重的罪行，战争罪从传统国际法中只规范作战手段，发展到国际人道法领域；从只规范国际性的武装冲突发展到适用于国内武装冲突；从国家责任原则发展到个人刑事责任原则。顺应国际社会和平发展的主题，是国际人权保护原则的发展的必然结果，也是社会文明进步的重要体现。 本文主要介绍了战争罪的概念、历史演变、犯罪构成以及战争罪的责任。 首先，从发展的角度以国际立法和审判实践为出发点，揭示了伴随着战争从一种国家天然权利到成为国际社会所禁止的“战争罪”的过程，，战争罪概念的内涵和外延不断扩展的发展过程。 其次，对战争罪的犯罪构成进行研究和探索，分别从主体要件、客观要件、主观要件方面分析了战争罪的构成。对于战争罪的主体要件，主要从行为主体和责任主体两个方面出发阐述，探讨了法学理论界对国家作为战争罪责任主体的相关争议。客观要件主要从战争罪的行为要件、危害结果及二者之间的因果关系进行分析。对主观要件的分析得出了构成战争罪的主要心理状态是明知或故意，特殊情况下过失也有可能成为战争罪的主观心理要件。 最后，从国家责任和个人责任两个不同的角度分析了战争罪的责任模式，明确了国家责任和个人责任各自不同的性质，并分别从责任的产生、构成以及责任的排除三个角度论证了战争罪的责任承担机制。通过分析，可以看到战争罪不断发展和完善的过程。
[Abstract]:As the most serious crime in international law, war crimes have developed from traditional international law to the field of international humanitarian law, from only regulating international armed conflicts to internal armed conflicts. From the principle of state responsibility to the principle of individual criminal responsibility. Conforming to the theme of peaceful development of the international community is the inevitable result of the development of the international human rights protection principle and an important embodiment of the progress of social civilization. This paper mainly introduces the concept of war crimes, the evolution of history, the constitution of crimes and the responsibility of war crimes. First of all, from the perspective of development, starting from international legislation and trial practice, it reveals the process of war from being a natural right of a nation to becoming a "war crime" prohibited by the international community. The connotation and extension of the concept of war crimes are expanding. Secondly, it studies and explores the constitution of war crimes, and analyzes the constitution of war crimes from the aspects of subjective elements, objective elements and subjective elements. As for the main elements of war crimes, this paper mainly expounds from two aspects: the main body of action and the subject of responsibility, and probes into the relevant disputes in the field of legal theory on the state as the subject of responsibility for war crimes. The objective elements are mainly analyzed from the behavioral elements of war crimes, the harmful results and the causality between them. From the analysis of subjective elements, it is concluded that the main mental state of war crimes is knowing or intentionally, and negligence may also be the subjective mental element of war crimes under special circumstances. Finally, from two different angles of state responsibility and individual responsibility, this paper analyzes the pattern of war crimes responsibility, clarifies the different nature of state responsibility and individual responsibility, and respectively from the generation of responsibility. The constitution and the exclusion of responsibility demonstrate the mechanism of the responsibility of war crimes. Through analysis, we can see the continuous development and improvement of war crimes.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.9
本文编号：2188659
[Abstract]:As the most serious crime in international law, war crimes have developed from traditional international law to the field of international humanitarian law, from only regulating international armed conflicts to internal armed conflicts. From the principle of state responsibility to the principle of individual criminal responsibility. Conforming to the theme of peaceful development of the international community is the inevitable result of the development of the international human rights protection principle and an important embodiment of the progress of social civilization. This paper mainly introduces the concept of war crimes, the evolution of history, the constitution of crimes and the responsibility of war crimes. First of all, from the perspective of development, starting from international legislation and trial practice, it reveals the process of war from being a natural right of a nation to becoming a "war crime" prohibited by the international community. The connotation and extension of the concept of war crimes are expanding. Secondly, it studies and explores the constitution of war crimes, and analyzes the constitution of war crimes from the aspects of subjective elements, objective elements and subjective elements. As for the main elements of war crimes, this paper mainly expounds from two aspects: the main body of action and the subject of responsibility, and probes into the relevant disputes in the field of legal theory on the state as the subject of responsibility for war crimes. The objective elements are mainly analyzed from the behavioral elements of war crimes, the harmful results and the causality between them. From the analysis of subjective elements, it is concluded that the main mental state of war crimes is knowing or intentionally, and negligence may also be the subjective mental element of war crimes under special circumstances. Finally, from two different angles of state responsibility and individual responsibility, this paper analyzes the pattern of war crimes responsibility, clarifies the different nature of state responsibility and individual responsibility, and respectively from the generation of responsibility. The constitution and the exclusion of responsibility demonstrate the mechanism of the responsibility of war crimes. Through analysis, we can see the continuous development and improvement of war crimes.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D997.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 杨咏亮;;试论国际性武装冲突中战争罪的国家责任[J];法学评论;2010年03期
2 赵少群;;国际法上战争罪内涵的历史演变[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2006年02期
3 赵秉志,王秀梅;论战争罪之内涵及其刑事责任主体[J];河北法学;2001年02期
4 邵沙平,赵劲松;伊拉克战争对国际法治的冲击和影响[J];法学论坛;2003年03期
5 王虎华;国家刑事责任的国际法批判[J];上海社会科学院学术季刊;2002年04期
6 赵少群;;国际法庭管辖的战争罪与武装冲突[J];政治与法律;2006年06期
本文编号：2188659
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2188659.html
