TPP与WTO争端解决机制比较研究

发布时间：2018-08-23 13:44

【摘要】：随经贸领域国际争端发生概率的日益提高,国际争端解决机制已经成为不可或缺的国际协调制度,成为许多国际协定的必备条款。世界贸易组织(以下简称“WTO”)作为世界上最大的经济组织,其争端解决机制因特色之鲜明,涉及领域之广泛,解决纠纷的数量之庞大而备受关注。TPP协定的面世推动了全球经贸规则的新一轮博弈,在争端解决领域,新生的TPP常规争端解决机制实现了若干突破与创新,它们既弥合了现行WTO争端解决机制的不足,也推动了当前区域贸易争端解决机制的纵深发展,更为当下中国方兴未艾的自贸区建设提供了有益借鉴。本文拟对TPP争端解决机制与WTO框架下争端解决规则进行法律解析、对比研究,以把握国际争端解决机制最新发展动态及其对未来国际贸易规则体系的长远影响。国际投资协定中的投资者—东道国争端解决(ISDS)机制成为当代投资协定中不可或缺的组成部分,但其自身也存在着一些制度性与技术性缺陷,在处理投资争端问题中引起各国的广泛关注。分析与研究ISDS机制有助于中国在双边投资协定谈判中保护本国的经济利益,并增强中国在制订国际投资新规则领域的话语权。第一章概述WTO、TPP及NAFTA的争端解决机制;第二章、第三章及第四章从争端解决机制的主体、程序、执行措施三方面详细阐述WTO及TPP争端解决机制的不同之处并分析TPP对WTO的冲击;第五章分析TPP对国际贸易规则发展的长远影响以及中国应对未来国际争端解决的策略。
[Abstract]:With the increasing probability of international disputes in the field of economic and trade, the mechanism of international dispute settlement has become an indispensable international coordination system and a necessary clause in many international agreements. As the world's largest economic organization, the World Trade Organization (hereinafter referred to as "WTO") has a wide range of dispute settlement mechanisms due to its distinctive characteristics. The emergence of the TPP Agreement has promoted a new round of game of global economic and trade rules. In the field of dispute settlement, the nascent conventional dispute settlement mechanism of TPP has achieved some breakthroughs and innovations. They not only bridge the deficiency of the current WTO dispute settlement mechanism, but also promote the deep development of the current regional trade dispute settlement mechanism. This paper intends to analyze the dispute settlement mechanism of TPP and the rules of dispute settlement under the framework of WTO, and make a comparative study in order to grasp the latest development of international dispute settlement mechanism and its long-term influence on the future rules system of international trade. The investor-host country dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism in international investment agreements (IIAS) has become an indispensable part of contemporary investment agreements, but it also has some institutional and technical defects. In dealing with the issue of investment disputes, many countries pay close attention to it. Analyzing and studying the ISDS mechanism is helpful for China to protect its economic interests in the negotiation of bilateral investment agreements (bits) and to strengthen China's right to speak in the field of formulating new rules for international investment. The first chapter summarizes the dispute settlement mechanism of WTO and NAFTA, the second chapter, the third and fourth chapters elaborate in detail the differences between WTO and TPP dispute settlement mechanism from the aspects of the subject, procedure and implementation measures of the dispute settlement mechanism, and analyze the impact of TPP on WTO. Chapter five analyzes the long-term influence of TPP on the development of international trade rules and China's strategy of dealing with future international dispute settlement.
【学位授予单位】：广东外语外贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D996.1

【参考文献】