国际民商事判决承认与执行中的司法礼让原则——对英国与加拿大相关理论及实践的考察
发布时间：2018-08-27 18:27
【摘要】：英国自17世纪开始承认和执行外国法院判决以来,在承认和执行外国判决的理论依据方面先后经历了"礼让说"、"债务论"等理论,1907年的艾默纽尔诉希芒案(Emanuel v.Symon)所确立的五条规则,基本上是英国法院承认和执行外国对人诉讼判决的基本规则。但1953年特华斯诉浩利案(Travers v.Holly)的判决,使得英国上诉法院开始考虑司法礼让问题;加拿大在1990年的莫哥德投资有限公司(Morguard Investments Ltd.v.De Savoye)案之前,一直遵循希芒案规则。但莫哥德投资公司案判例所包含的司法礼让规则,丰富了加拿大国际私法的"就近原则"。莫哥德投资公司案由此成为加拿大各姊妹省相互间承认和执行法院判决具有里程碑意义的判例。英国及加拿大的理论与实践,对解决我国各法域间民商事判决的相互承认与执行问题,无疑具有重要借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:Since Britain began to recognize and enforce foreign court decisions in the 17th century, In the theoretical basis of the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, it has experienced the theory of "comity" and "debt theory" successively, and the five rules established in the case of Emmanuel v. Simao (Emanuel v.Symon) in 1907. It is basically the basic rule for the English courts to recognize and enforce foreign judgments in action in personae. But the 1953 decision in Twains v. Travers v.Holly led the British Court of Appeal to consider the issue of judicial comity, while Canada followed the Simao rule until the 1990 (Morguard Investments Ltd.v.De Savoye case. However, the judicial comity rule contained in the case of Mogoth Investment Corporation enriches the "proximity principle" of Canadian private international law. The Mogode Investment case has thus become a landmark case in the recognition and enforcement of court decisions among the sister provinces of Canada. The theory and practice of Britain and Canada are undoubtedly of great significance for solving the problems of mutual recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments in various jurisdictions of our country.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学;
【基金】：霍英东基金会“第九届高等院校青年教师科研奖”项目《国际民商管辖权立法问题研究》(项目号91093)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D997
，
本文编号：2208080
[Abstract]:Since Britain began to recognize and enforce foreign court decisions in the 17th century, In the theoretical basis of the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, it has experienced the theory of "comity" and "debt theory" successively, and the five rules established in the case of Emmanuel v. Simao (Emanuel v.Symon) in 1907. It is basically the basic rule for the English courts to recognize and enforce foreign judgments in action in personae. But the 1953 decision in Twains v. Travers v.Holly led the British Court of Appeal to consider the issue of judicial comity, while Canada followed the Simao rule until the 1990 (Morguard Investments Ltd.v.De Savoye case. However, the judicial comity rule contained in the case of Mogoth Investment Corporation enriches the "proximity principle" of Canadian private international law. The Mogode Investment case has thus become a landmark case in the recognition and enforcement of court decisions among the sister provinces of Canada. The theory and practice of Britain and Canada are undoubtedly of great significance for solving the problems of mutual recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments in various jurisdictions of our country.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学;
【基金】：霍英东基金会“第九届高等院校青年教师科研奖”项目《国际民商管辖权立法问题研究》(项目号91093)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D997
，
本文编号：2208080
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2208080.html
