ICC国际仲裁院在我国作成仲裁裁决的承认与执行——兼论《纽约公约》视角下的“非内国裁决”

发布时间：2018-08-28 18:31

【摘要】：2009年浙江省宁波市中级人民法院审理的"宁波工艺品公司案"在学界与实务界引发了关于国际商会国际仲裁院在我国作成仲裁裁决是否《纽约公约》意义上"非内国裁决"的广泛争议。《纽约公约》并未对"非内国裁决"的判断标准作出统一的规定,而是将这一问题留给缔约国进行解释。从实践看,《纽约公约》各缔约国对"非内国裁决"作出的解释宽严不一。将国际商会国际仲裁院在我国作成的仲裁裁决定性为"非内国裁决"不仅与我国的仲裁理念不符,而且也面临现实的法律障碍。在我国现行仲裁法律框架下,将国际商会国际仲裁院在我国作成的仲裁裁决定性为"涉外仲裁裁决"应是不违反我国承担的国际法义务且修法成本最低、最符合我国司法主权以及仲裁理念的选择。
[Abstract]:The Ningbo Crafts Company case heard by Ningbo City Intermediate people's Court in Zhejiang Province in 2009 has triggered off the question of whether the International Chamber of Commerce International Arbitration Court has rendered an arbitration award in the sense of "New York Convention" in the academic and practical circles. The New York Convention does not provide for uniform criteria for the determination of "non-domestic awards". Rather, it leaves the issue to the State party for explanation. In practice, the New York Convention states have different interpretations of "non-domestic award". The international arbitration court of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) is characterized as "non-domestic award", which is not only inconsistent with our country's arbitration concept, but also faces a practical legal obstacle. Under the framework of China's current arbitration law, the international arbitration award made by the International Chamber of Commerce in China should be classified as "foreign arbitration award", which should not violate our country's international law obligations and the lowest cost of amending the law. Most accord with our country judicial sovereignty and the choice of arbitration idea.
【作者单位】：复旦大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究基金资助项目(08JA820006)
【分类号】：D997.4

【二级参考文献】