中国应对美国反补贴措施的法律策略分析
[Abstract]:With China's entry into WTO in 2001, China's foreign trade has made rapid progress, and it has become the second largest exporter of goods in the world. At the same time, the trade friction between China and the United States has also risen rapidly. At present, the main remedy for US trade with China is countervailing. By studying how the United States countervailing law is applicable to China, it provides a theoretical and practical basis for China to deal with the "double countervailing" investigation conducted by the United States. In order to achieve the following objectives,: (i) focuses on non-market economy status, anti-dumping and countervailing repeated relief, and how to specifically apply in countervailing cases to China, and analyzes the specific operation and relief effect of US countervailing to China. Areas involved and its impact on China; (ii) China seeks legal responses to U.S. countervailing measures. The main structure of this paper is as follows: firstly, this paper analyzes the current situation of American countervailing to China, the reasons why China frequently encounters American countervailing investigation, and the influence on Chinese enterprises. Deeply understand the seriousness of the US countervailing problem to China. Secondly, the analysis of the application of American countervailing law to China's trade. By analyzing how the United States brings non-market economy countries into the jurisdiction of countervailing law through legislative practice, this paper discusses in detail the issue of "double countervailing" measures adopted by the United States in trade with China. This paper analyzes how to apply American countervailing law to Chinese countervailing cases. Finally, how to protect the interests of Sino-US trade in practice, how to perfect it in legislation and practice, and how to play games in Sino-US trade. This paper attempts to probe into American countervailing to China and its influence from the angle of theory and practice, law and economics. Based on the analysis of the current situation of US countervailing to China, this paper expounds the legislation and practice of US countervailing to China, focusing on two problems in the application of US countervailing to China: the status of non-market economy and the problem of "double countervailing" measures. The special policies and practices of the United States towards Chinese products have led to repeated relief and excessive relief of anti-dumping and countervailing, because the economic and policy fields involved in countervailing have been continuously expanded, and the macroeconomic policy level has been constantly touched upon. The impact on China cannot be ignored. It is necessary for the Chinese government and enterprises to prepare for a long-term response and actively seek countermeasures. The significance of this paper lies in: as Chinese products are subjected to more and more "double reaction" investigations in the United States, the problem of dual remedies is also widespread, and the American "double counter" investigation not only has a negative impact on the micro level of Chinese enterprises, It also poses a challenge to the macro-economic policies of Chinese governments at all levels. At the same time, the countervailing measures of the United States to China will certainly lead other countries and regions to emulate in a large area, and will make China encounter a new wave of countervailing, and the situation will be quite severe. In this context, it is of great practical significance to study the countervailing problems of the United States to China from the aspects of theory and rules, practice, relief effect and objects involved, and to explore China's countermeasures. Today, 11 years after China's accession to the WTO, China has entered the second transitional period of the WTO. With the increasing trade deficit between China and the United States, Sino-US trade disputes will become more intense in the coming decades. How to base and develop China in the wave of countervailing will become an important issue, which not only considers China's ability to deal with the crisis, but also urges China to seek opportunities in the crisis so as to realize the common development of the global economy.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 陈利强;;WTO协定下美国贸易权利论——以美国对中国实施“双轨制反补贴措施”为视角[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2008年02期
2 曹和平;王宏;;美加对华适用反补贴法及中国的对策[J];法学评论;2008年04期
3 陈卫东;;从中美“双反措施案”看外部基准的适用[J];法学;2012年02期
4 金彭年;高甜;;中国面临反补贴调查的原因及对策研究[J];法治研究;2008年10期
5 刘艳云;;我国应对反补贴问题的思考[J];河北法学;2009年06期
6 王剑;;美国反补贴规则适用解析——美国对中国进口产品发起反补贴调查的法律分析[J];河北法学;2010年03期
7 陈安;;中国加入WTO十年的法理断想:简论WTO的法治、立法、执法、守法与变法[J];现代法学;2010年06期
8 许楚敬;;国际公法在WTO争端解决中的作用与应用[J];现代法学;2010年06期
9 刘勇;;论GATT 1994第20条对中国加入议定书的可适用性——由“中国原材料出口限制措施案”引发的思考[J];环球法律评论;2012年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 辛华;[N];中国贸易报;2008年
2 任思强;[N];北京商报;2007年
3 华迅;[N];消费日报;2007年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 林惠玲;美国反补贴实体法律实施问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 阳源又;美国对华反补贴法律问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年
2 刘彤;中国非市场经济地位法律问题研究[D];西北大学;2009年
3 许夙愿;中国面临反补贴趋势及对策研究[D];天津财经大学;2009年
4 孙朔;国外对华反补贴及我国应对策略研究[D];山西财经大学;2008年
5 曾萍;美国对华反补贴认定补贴利益的外部基准法律问题研究[D];中国政法大学;2010年
本文编号:2215220
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2215220.html