WTO争端解决机制中的执行制度研究
发布时间：2018-09-07 18:30
【摘要】：WTO争端解决机制是乌拉圭回合的主要成就之一,DSU采用反向协商一致的议事规则,保证了WTO争端解决程序的顺利进行,投诉方也因此迅速的获得DSB建议。在执行制度方面,DSU新设合理期限制度、复审制度、补偿制度、以及改进报复制度改善了DSB建议,但DSB建议的执行仍然是WTO争端解决实践中的主要问题之一,阻碍了WTO争端解决机制的正常运行。对于DSU可执行性的修改成为了现在谈判协商的重点。在修改过程中,必须遵守以下宗旨,即任何改革WTO争端解决执行制度的建议都必须立足于国际政治经济现实基础之上,以服务于贸易自由化、保护各成员国贸易利益为最终目标。 WTO争端解决执行制度总体上运转良好,改进和加强有关规则和制度十分必要,本论文共分四个部分对WTO争端解决的执行问题进行研究,具体内容如下： 第一部分主要对WTO争端解决机制的历史进行了回顾,阐述了争端解决执行制度的相关问题。 第二部分主要是对执行程序中涉及的合理期限制度、复审制度、补偿制度和报复制度等四大制度的基本问题进行了阐述,并分析了这些制度存在的问题。 第三部分主要针对第二部分中提出的有关四大制度存在的问题提出修改建议。 第四部分主要结合中国参与WTO争端解决的实际情况,分析中国今后在WTO争端解决中的立场及应对策略。
[Abstract]:The WTO dispute settlement mechanism is one of the main achievements of the Uruguay Round, which adopts the reverse consensus rules of procedure, which ensures the smooth progress of the WTO dispute settlement procedure, and the complainant receives the DSB proposal quickly. The new reasonable period system, the review system, the compensation system and the improvement of the retaliation system have improved the DSB proposal, but the implementation of the DSB recommendation is still one of the main problems in the practice of WTO dispute settlement. It hinders the normal operation of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Changes to the DSU executable have become the focus of negotiations now. In the process of revision, the purpose must be observed, that is, any proposal to reform the WTO dispute settlement implementation system must be based on international political and economic realities in the service of trade liberalization, The ultimate objective is to protect the trade interests of member countries. The WTO dispute settlement implementation system is functioning well in general, and it is necessary to improve and strengthen the relevant rules and systems, This thesis is divided into four parts to study the implementation of WTO dispute settlement. The main contents are as follows: the first part mainly reviews the history of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and expounds the relevant issues of the dispute settlement implementation system. The second part mainly expounds the basic problems of the four systems, such as the reasonable time limit system, the retrial system, the compensation system and the retaliation system, and analyzes the problems existing in these systems. In the third part, the author puts forward some suggestions about the problems of the four systems in the second part. The fourth part mainly analyzes China's position and countermeasures in WTO dispute settlement in the light of the actual situation of China's participation in WTO dispute settlement.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1
本文编号：2229078
[Abstract]:The WTO dispute settlement mechanism is one of the main achievements of the Uruguay Round, which adopts the reverse consensus rules of procedure, which ensures the smooth progress of the WTO dispute settlement procedure, and the complainant receives the DSB proposal quickly. The new reasonable period system, the review system, the compensation system and the improvement of the retaliation system have improved the DSB proposal, but the implementation of the DSB recommendation is still one of the main problems in the practice of WTO dispute settlement. It hinders the normal operation of WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Changes to the DSU executable have become the focus of negotiations now. In the process of revision, the purpose must be observed, that is, any proposal to reform the WTO dispute settlement implementation system must be based on international political and economic realities in the service of trade liberalization, The ultimate objective is to protect the trade interests of member countries. The WTO dispute settlement implementation system is functioning well in general, and it is necessary to improve and strengthen the relevant rules and systems, This thesis is divided into four parts to study the implementation of WTO dispute settlement. The main contents are as follows: the first part mainly reviews the history of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism and expounds the relevant issues of the dispute settlement implementation system. The second part mainly expounds the basic problems of the four systems, such as the reasonable time limit system, the retrial system, the compensation system and the retaliation system, and analyzes the problems existing in these systems. In the third part, the author puts forward some suggestions about the problems of the four systems in the second part. The fourth part mainly analyzes China's position and countermeasures in WTO dispute settlement in the light of the actual situation of China's participation in WTO dispute settlement.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 张乃根;试析WTO争端解决的国际法拘束力[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2003年06期
2 余丽;;WTO执行争端次序问题:双边解决和多边完善[J];法律适用;2007年02期
3 张乃根;论WTO争端解决机制的几个主要国际法问题[J];法学评论;2001年05期
4 黄志雄;对发展中国家参与GATT/WTO争端解决活动的法律分析[J];法学评论;2001年06期
5 向凌;;WTO争端解决机制中报复措施的缺陷及革新路径探析[J];时代法学;2005年06期
6 胡北平,李美红;发展中国家对WTO争端解决机制的改革要求及改革前景[J];社会科学辑刊;2005年05期
7 于洋;梁咏;;略论中国在WTO争端解决机制中的角色转换[J];行政与法;2007年01期
8 蒋新苗;DSU补偿措施的革新路径[J];中国法学;2004年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 蔡芳;WTO争端解决中的执行机制研究[D];西南政法大学;2005年
2 杨文杰;GATT/WTO贸易报复措施研究[D];武汉大学;2005年
3 任祥;WTO争端解决机制的裁决执行制度研究[D];华东政法学院;2006年
4 陈冠军;刍议WTO争端解决机制的执行程序[D];山东大学;2006年
5 仇婷婷;论WTO争端解决机制的执行制度及我国的应对策略[D];兰州大学;2008年
6 李源;论WTO争端解决中执行制度的现状及改进[D];中国政法大学;2010年
，本文编号：2229078
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2229078.html
