中国对中菲南海争端案仲裁庭管辖权提出反对的效果辨析
发布时间：2018-09-14 19:05
【摘要】：不管中方是否提出管辖权异议,仲裁庭都负有举证责任证明对本案具有管辖权。为使仲裁庭更积极地探寻和调查有关管辖权异议的事实和理由,中国有必要通过适当途径就管辖权所涉事实和法律问题向仲裁庭提供利我且全面的信息。针对菲方最近提出的诉状,中方应采取更多样化的程序外方式加强与仲裁庭的沟通。
[Abstract]:Whether or not the Chinese side challenges jurisdiction, the burden of proof is on the tribunal to prove jurisdiction over the case. In order to make the arbitral tribunal more active in seeking and investigating the facts and reasons of the jurisdiction objection, it is necessary for China to provide the arbitral tribunal with beneficial and comprehensive information on the factual and legal issues involved in the jurisdiction through appropriate channels. In response to the recent filing by the Philippines, China should adopt a more diversified extra-procedural approach to strengthen communication with the arbitral tribunal.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学中国边界与海洋研究院;
【基金】：中央财政支持中西部高校提升综合实力科研创新团队建设专项规划项目“我国南海海洋权益维护研究”阶段性成果
【分类号】：D993.5;D994
，
本文编号：2243611
[Abstract]:Whether or not the Chinese side challenges jurisdiction, the burden of proof is on the tribunal to prove jurisdiction over the case. In order to make the arbitral tribunal more active in seeking and investigating the facts and reasons of the jurisdiction objection, it is necessary for China to provide the arbitral tribunal with beneficial and comprehensive information on the factual and legal issues involved in the jurisdiction through appropriate channels. In response to the recent filing by the Philippines, China should adopt a more diversified extra-procedural approach to strengthen communication with the arbitral tribunal.
【作者单位】： 武汉大学中国边界与海洋研究院;
【基金】：中央财政支持中西部高校提升综合实力科研创新团队建设专项规划项目“我国南海海洋权益维护研究”阶段性成果
【分类号】：D993.5;D994
，
本文编号：2243611
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2243611.html
