专利产品平行进口研究
发布时间:2018-10-09 13:15
【摘要】:中国2008年《专利法》在第69条中允许专利产品的平行进口。对是否允许专利产品的平行进口的问题,TRIPS协议进行了回避,交由各国国内法解决,在实践中对此问题的态度往往取决于各国的经济利益和贸易政策,各国的司法实践中有不同的判例。我国允许专利产品平行进口,在国内利与弊并存,在国际上可能面临发达国家外交和贸易的威胁。针对我国所面临的问题,本文从专利产品平行进口基本理论和司法实践入手,借鉴欧盟专利权区域耗尽的实践经验,对在中国东盟自由贸易区建立专利权区域耗尽可行性进行了研究,对《TRIPS与公共健康多哈宣言》的形成过程进行研究,探讨联合广大发展中国家推动国际条约修改,,使专利权国际耗尽原则普遍适用。从理论上、司法实践上研究允许专利产品平行进口相关依据,是否允许专利产品平行进口不单纯是一个知识产权理论问题,而是一个关乎一国经济利益和贸易政策的问题。以市场经济中各方主体利益为研究视角,对我国允许专利平行进口后所带来的负面影响进行分析,提出解决问题的办法,做好防范工作防患于未然,使这一立法新成果真正服务于我国技术进步和经济建设。
[Abstract]:In Article 69 of the 2008 Patent Law of China, parallel imports of patented products are permitted. The question of whether to allow parallel import of patented products has been evaded and referred to the domestic laws of various countries. In practice, the attitude to this issue often depends on the economic interests and trade policies of each country. There are different precedents in the judicial practice of various countries. China allows the parallel import of patent products, which has both advantages and disadvantages, and may face the threat of diplomacy and trade in developed countries. In view of the problems faced by our country, this paper starts with the basic theory and judicial practice of parallel import of patented products, and draws lessons from the practical experience of regional depletion of patent rights in the EU. This paper studies the feasibility of establishing patent region depletion in China-ASEAN Free Trade area, studies the forming process of TRIPS and Doha Declaration on Public Health, and discusses the cooperation of developing countries in promoting the revision of international treaties. The principle of international exhaustion of patent rights is universally applicable. In theory, judicial practice studies the relevant basis of allowing parallel import of patent products. Whether to allow parallel import of patented products is not simply a theoretical issue of intellectual property, but a problem related to the economic interests and trade policies of a country. From the perspective of the main interests of all parties in the market economy, this paper analyzes the negative effects brought by the parallel import of patents in China, puts forward solutions to the problems, and does a good job of prevention and prevention. Make this legislation new achievement to serve our country technology progress and economic construction truly.
【学位授予单位】:华中科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:G306.3
本文编号:2259466
[Abstract]:In Article 69 of the 2008 Patent Law of China, parallel imports of patented products are permitted. The question of whether to allow parallel import of patented products has been evaded and referred to the domestic laws of various countries. In practice, the attitude to this issue often depends on the economic interests and trade policies of each country. There are different precedents in the judicial practice of various countries. China allows the parallel import of patent products, which has both advantages and disadvantages, and may face the threat of diplomacy and trade in developed countries. In view of the problems faced by our country, this paper starts with the basic theory and judicial practice of parallel import of patented products, and draws lessons from the practical experience of regional depletion of patent rights in the EU. This paper studies the feasibility of establishing patent region depletion in China-ASEAN Free Trade area, studies the forming process of TRIPS and Doha Declaration on Public Health, and discusses the cooperation of developing countries in promoting the revision of international treaties. The principle of international exhaustion of patent rights is universally applicable. In theory, judicial practice studies the relevant basis of allowing parallel import of patent products. Whether to allow parallel import of patented products is not simply a theoretical issue of intellectual property, but a problem related to the economic interests and trade policies of a country. From the perspective of the main interests of all parties in the market economy, this paper analyzes the negative effects brought by the parallel import of patents in China, puts forward solutions to the problems, and does a good job of prevention and prevention. Make this legislation new achievement to serve our country technology progress and economic construction truly.
【学位授予单位】:华中科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:G306.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李玉文,方秀云;平行进口:知识产权保护与贸易自由化的冲突[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2000年03期
2 张今;欧盟平行进口与商标权保护的新进展[J];中华商标;2001年04期
3 马乐;刘亚军;;平行进口法律规制的再思考——以知识产权独占许可为视角[J];当代法学;2009年02期
4 陈海浪;杨思哲;马遥;;专利产品平行进口不同立法的价值取向分析[J];当代经理人;2006年17期
5 朱元成;;新《专利法》第69条关于平行进口问题的立法探析[J];法制与社会;2009年35期
6 余翔;专利权穷竭与专利产品平行进口——欧共体法律、实践及相关理论剖析[J];国际贸易;2000年02期
7 余翔;扭曲发展——台湾地区知识产权权利耗尽与平行进口体制解析[J];国际贸易;2002年06期
8 张永艾;权利穷竭原则探究——兼论平行进口问题[J];河北法学;2004年03期
9 师华,黄羡玲;TRIPS协议弹性条款与中国知识产权立法的完善[J];经济问题;2003年10期
10 武兰芬;姜军;余翔;;专利产品平行进口政策对社会福利的影响及我国对策研究[J];科研管理;2006年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 胡滨斌;国际贸易中的知识产权限制研究[D];复旦大学;2007年
本文编号:2259466
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2259466.html