“一带一路”下中国区域贸易协定争端解决机制研究
发布时间：2018-10-10 15:44
【摘要】："一带一路"是中国在新的全球时代背景下的一项伟大工程,惠及国家众多。在中国的主导下,一定会对全球的相关经济和贸易往来的新格局产生深远的影响。而区域贸易协定是实现"一带一路"的重要的手段与工具,而较为稳健有效的争端解决机制设计与实施是区域贸易协定落地最为重要的核心要素,也是能否顺利实现"一带一路"的关键。"一带一路"途经的各国地缘政治复杂、国情各异,如何解决彼此间签署的区域贸易协定争端势必是我们所关注的重点。如何在现有的法律框架下搭建可运行高效的争端解决机制,如何运用各种法律手段来推进所签署贸易协定权利义务的完全落实,都是我们应该关注的难点和重点。本文即针对此难点,对现有国际和国内的区域贸易协定的相关争端机制进行比较分析,从协定文本的制定和实践落实情况的良好程度分别对中国目前争端解决机制和世界其它区域贸易协定争端解决机制进行比较分析后做出评价,进而提出在"一带一路"新视角下,中国拟签署的区域贸易协定的争端解决机制的新建构。笔者分别对WTO争端解决机制、欧盟签署区域贸易协定争端解决机制、北美自由贸易协定等传统且落实优良的国际组织或国际区域贸易协定形式的争端机制的比较分析上,立足于当下的国际司法大环境,同时对中国已签署的自由贸易协定的争端解决机制归纳总结上,提出笔者对于"一带一路"下的区域贸易协定的争端解决机制的架构的可行性建议。
[Abstract]:Belt and Road is a great project for China in the new global era, benefiting many countries. Under China's leadership, it will have a profound impact on the new pattern of global economic and trade relations. Regional trade agreement is an important means and tool to realize "Belt and Road", and the design and implementation of more stable and effective dispute settlement mechanism is the most important core element of the landing of regional trade agreement. It is also the key to the smooth realization of Belt and Road. " Belt and Road's geopolitics and national conditions are different, so how to resolve the disputes between them is the focus of our attention. How to set up an efficient dispute settlement mechanism under the existing legal framework and how to use various legal means to promote the full implementation of the rights and obligations of signed trade agreements are the difficulties and key points that we should pay attention to. In view of this difficulty, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the existing international and domestic RTAs' dispute mechanisms. After comparing and analyzing the current dispute settlement mechanism of China and the dispute settlement mechanism of other regional trade agreements in the world, the author makes an evaluation from the good degree of the formulation of the text of the agreement and the implementation of the agreement in practice. Then, under the new angle of view of Belt and Road, the new construction of dispute settlement mechanism of regional trade agreement to be signed by China is put forward. The author makes a comparative analysis of the dispute settlement mechanism of WTO, the dispute settlement mechanism signed by the European Union and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Based on the current international judicial environment, and at the same time summing up the dispute settlement mechanism of the free trade agreement that China has signed, The author puts forward some feasible suggestions on the framework of dispute settlement mechanism of regional trade agreement under Belt and Road.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D996.1
本文编号：2262343
[Abstract]:Belt and Road is a great project for China in the new global era, benefiting many countries. Under China's leadership, it will have a profound impact on the new pattern of global economic and trade relations. Regional trade agreement is an important means and tool to realize "Belt and Road", and the design and implementation of more stable and effective dispute settlement mechanism is the most important core element of the landing of regional trade agreement. It is also the key to the smooth realization of Belt and Road. " Belt and Road's geopolitics and national conditions are different, so how to resolve the disputes between them is the focus of our attention. How to set up an efficient dispute settlement mechanism under the existing legal framework and how to use various legal means to promote the full implementation of the rights and obligations of signed trade agreements are the difficulties and key points that we should pay attention to. In view of this difficulty, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the existing international and domestic RTAs' dispute mechanisms. After comparing and analyzing the current dispute settlement mechanism of China and the dispute settlement mechanism of other regional trade agreements in the world, the author makes an evaluation from the good degree of the formulation of the text of the agreement and the implementation of the agreement in practice. Then, under the new angle of view of Belt and Road, the new construction of dispute settlement mechanism of regional trade agreement to be signed by China is put forward. The author makes a comparative analysis of the dispute settlement mechanism of WTO, the dispute settlement mechanism signed by the European Union and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Based on the current international judicial environment, and at the same time summing up the dispute settlement mechanism of the free trade agreement that China has signed, The author puts forward some feasible suggestions on the framework of dispute settlement mechanism of regional trade agreement under Belt and Road.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D996.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李冰漪;;“一带一路”战略构想背后的现实考量[J];中国储运;2015年03期
2 王敬文;;一带一路新战略[J];管理观察;2015年03期
3 包运成;;“一带一路”建设的法律思考[J];前沿;2015年01期
4 蒋德翠;谢岳峰;;国际投资争端解决机制新趋势及中国的对策[J];商业时代;2014年33期
5 张莉;;“一带一路”战略应关注的问题及实施路径[J];中国经贸导刊;2014年27期
6 张蕴岭;;聚焦一带一路大战略[J];大陆桥视野;2014年08期
7 王海运;赵常庆;李建民;孙壮志;A.B.奥斯特洛夫斯基;聂书岭;杨恕;李新;杨成;张恒龙;陈利君;陈继东;王维然;潘志平;朴键一;范丽君;张宁;王海燕;肖斌;吴宏伟;;“丝绸之路经济带”构想的背景、潜在挑战和未来走势[J];欧亚经济;2014年04期
8 戴兴泓;;国际争端解决机制现状与展望[J];社会科学家;2012年06期
9 李晶珠;;中国引入临时仲裁的制约因素及其克服[J];黑龙江社会科学;2010年05期
10 胡晓红;;中外双边投资协定争端解决机制模式选择——以中国与上合组织成员国间BITs为视角[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2009年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 佘能梅;欧盟自由贸易协定争端解决机制研究[D];西南政法大学;2013年
2 郑晨星;《北美自由贸易协定》投资争端仲裁机制研究[D];外交学院;2009年
，本文编号：2262343
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2262343.html
