当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 国际法论文 >

反倾销法中替代国制度及中国对策研究

发布时间:2018-10-11 10:12
【摘要】:在国际经济全球化的趋势下,国际贸易迅速发展,世界各国的企业对国际市场的依赖程度日益增加。但与此同时,各国在发展对外贸易的同时,相互之间的摩擦也日益增多,使用WTO允许的反倾销、反补贴和保障措施三种贸易救济方式对处理国际贸易过程中的争端发挥着巨大作用,能够对国际贸易的秩序起到规范作用。WTO允许的贸易救济方式合法合理的使用能够保障国际贸易的健康发展,但是如果各国将其作为保护本国产业利益的工具而加以滥用,则会引起国际贸易过程中的不公平、不公正待遇,对国际贸易的发展起阻碍作用。中国实行改革开放政策以来,经济迅速发展,对外贸易额也迅速增加,市场经济体制逐步完善,在世界范围内取得了举世瞩目的成就。但是中国在国际贸易领域却面临着诸多的不公平待遇,中国现已成为世界遭受反倾销调查最多的国家,反倾销已被作为美国、欧盟等国家贸易保护主义的工具在国际贸易中频繁使用。中国入世以后,却又始终面临着“非市场经济”地位问题所带来的困扰,中国产品在接受外国的反倾销调查时经常被使用替代国制度来计算产品的正常价值。 第一部分介绍替代国制度的基本理论,包括替代国制度的概念、替代国制度在国际法上的发展演变,最后介绍替代国制度产生的法律原因。 第二部分阐述的是替代国制度对中国的影响,首先从介绍中国遭受反倾销调查的基本状况和目前中国反倾销法律制度的基本状况出发,分析替代国制度对中国的歧视性待遇以及“非市场经济”问题的实质。 第三部分是对美国、欧盟、加拿大、澳大利亚和印度的反倾销法中替代国制度的研究。 第四部分通过揭示替代国制度贸易保护主义本质,分析该制度和WTO基本原则和WTO反倾销法律规则的关系,最后从法理学的角度对其进行合理性进行探讨。 第五部分是基于对替代国制度的特征和本质而对中国政府、企业和立法层面提出的对策和建议,对于合理应对替代国制度具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:Under the trend of international economic globalization, international trade develops rapidly, and the enterprises in the world depend on the international market day by day. But at the same time, while developing foreign trade, the friction among countries is also increasing day by day. The antidumping allowed by WTO is used. Anti-subsidy and safeguard measures play an important role in dealing with disputes in the process of international trade. The legal and reasonable use of the trade relief allowed by the WTO can ensure the healthy development of international trade, but if countries abuse it as a tool to protect their industrial interests, It will cause unfair and unfair treatment in the process of international trade and hinder the development of international trade. Since the implementation of the policy of reform and opening to the outside world, China's economy has developed rapidly, its foreign trade volume has also increased rapidly, the market economy system has been gradually improved, and it has made remarkable achievements in the world. However, China is facing a lot of unfair treatment in the field of international trade. China has now become the country that has suffered the most anti-dumping investigations in the world, and anti-dumping has been regarded as the United States. The instruments of trade protectionism in the European Union and other countries are frequently used in international trade. After China's entry into WTO, however, it is always confronted with the problem of "non-market economy" status. Chinese products are often used to calculate the normal value of products when they accept anti-dumping investigations from foreign countries. The first part introduces the basic theory of surrogate country system, including the concept of surrogate country system, the development and evolution of surrogate country system in international law, and finally introduces the legal reasons for the generation of surrogate country system. The second part expounds the influence of surrogate country system on China. Firstly, it introduces the basic situation of anti-dumping investigation in China and the basic status of China's antidumping legal system at present. This paper analyzes the discriminatory treatment of surrogate country system against China and the essence of "non-market economy". The third part is a study of the surrogate country system in the anti-dumping laws of the United States, the European Union, Canada, Australia and India. In the fourth part, by revealing the nature of trade protectionism in surrogate country system, the author analyzes the relationship between the system and the basic principles of WTO and the anti-dumping legal rules of WTO. Finally, the rationality of the system is discussed from the angle of jurisprudence. The fifth part is based on the characteristics and nature of the surrogate country system to the Chinese government, enterprises and legislative level put forward countermeasures and suggestions, for a reasonable response to the surrogate country system is of great significance.
【学位授予单位】:中国海洋大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D996.1;F752.02

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 冉宗荣;论西方“替代国制度”的本质及危害[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2005年05期

2 胡剑;;试述法理学视角下的替代国制度[J];法制与经济(上半月);2007年12期

3 杨瑶;;欧盟反倾销规则非市场经济国家问题研究[J];法制与社会;2009年27期

4 王晓非;评欧盟反倾销法及实践中替代国方法的消极性[J];国际贸易问题;2003年08期

5 徐昱春;论WTO《反倾销协议》替代国制度的存废与完善[J];河北科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年03期

6 刘江琴;马德才;;析替代国制度及我国的应对策略[J];长江大学学报(社会科学版);2006年02期

7 陈力;;美国反倾销法之“非市场经济”规则研究[J];美国研究;2006年03期

8 陈立虎;关于《中国入世议定书》中替代国条款的思考[J];法制与社会发展;2002年06期

9 吕昆燕;马鹏;;论反倾销中的替代国制度问题[J];商业时代;2009年22期

10 王永杰,丁国军;论WTO成员对华适用替代国制度的国际法依据与中国的应对之策[J];行政与法;2003年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 董婷;美国对华反倾销中替代国制度研究[D];大连海事大学;2006年

2 周静;反倾销法中替代国制度研究[D];外交学院;2008年

3 刘平平;欧盟反倾销法中的类比国制度研究[D];西北大学;2009年

4 侯哲;论欧盟对华反倾销的替代国制度[D];吉林大学;2009年

5 郭影;国际反倾销实践中的替代国制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2009年



本文编号:2263813

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2263813.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户72a06***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com