欧盟海关知识产权执法制度研究及其启示
发布时间：2018-10-16 17:06
【摘要】：随着全球一体化和贸易自由化进程的加快，国际贸易对于一个国家经济发展的重要性日益凸显，而伴随着侵犯知识产权的非法货物在国际贸易中大量涌现，国际贸易关注的焦点也更多地聚集在知识产权的海关保护上。TRIPS协议产生后，其明确赋予海关知识产权执法职能，，海关知识产权执法制度成为各国应对知识产权侵权的强力武器。欧盟有着先进的知识产权立法理念及丰富的执法经验，特别是在海关知识产权执法方面有许多值得我国学习和借鉴的地方。 本文采用历史研究、数据分析、案例分析以及对比分析等方法，从以下几方面对欧盟海关知识产权执法制度进行探讨。首先，采用历史的研究方法，介绍了欧盟海关知识产权执法依据的发展历程，并分析了其相关内容，重点介绍了欧盟知识产权海关保护条例和TRIPS协议；其次，运用数据分析与案例分析的研究方法，对欧盟海关知识产权执法的总体情况以及几个典型案例进行分析；再次，运用对比分析法，从实体和程序方面对中欧海关知识产权执法制度进行分析，比较了两者的差异；最后，先分析了我国海关知识产权执法的现状及其存在的问题，然后在结合我国国情的基础上，参照欧盟海关知识产权执法制度，给出对我国海关知识产权执法与企业发展的启示。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of the process of global integration and trade liberalization, the importance of international trade to the economic development of a country is becoming increasingly prominent. The focus of international trade is also more focused on the customs protection of intellectual property rights. After the emergence of the TRIPS agreement, it clearly endows the customs with the function of intellectual property law enforcement, and the enforcement system of customs intellectual property rights becomes a powerful weapon for countries to deal with intellectual property infringement. EU has advanced intellectual property legislation concept and rich law enforcement experience, especially in customs intellectual property law enforcement, there are many worthy of our country to learn and learn from. By means of historical research, data analysis, case analysis and comparative analysis, this paper probes into the law enforcement system of customs intellectual property rights in EU from the following aspects. Firstly, using the historical research method, this paper introduces the development course of the EU Customs intellectual property Law Enforcement basis, and analyzes its relevant contents, focusing on the EU intellectual property Customs Protection regulations and the TRIPS Agreement. Using the research method of data analysis and case analysis, the general situation and several typical cases of EU customs intellectual property law enforcement are analyzed. Thirdly, the comparative analysis method is used. From the aspect of entity and procedure, this paper analyzes and compares the differences between China and Europe's customs intellectual property law enforcement system. Finally, it analyzes the current situation and existing problems of China's customs intellectual property law enforcement, and then, on the basis of combining the national conditions of our country, With reference to the EU Customs intellectual property Law Enforcement system, the enlightenment to China's Customs intellectual property Law Enforcement and Enterprise Development is given.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.4;D997
本文编号：2275063
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of the process of global integration and trade liberalization, the importance of international trade to the economic development of a country is becoming increasingly prominent. The focus of international trade is also more focused on the customs protection of intellectual property rights. After the emergence of the TRIPS agreement, it clearly endows the customs with the function of intellectual property law enforcement, and the enforcement system of customs intellectual property rights becomes a powerful weapon for countries to deal with intellectual property infringement. EU has advanced intellectual property legislation concept and rich law enforcement experience, especially in customs intellectual property law enforcement, there are many worthy of our country to learn and learn from. By means of historical research, data analysis, case analysis and comparative analysis, this paper probes into the law enforcement system of customs intellectual property rights in EU from the following aspects. Firstly, using the historical research method, this paper introduces the development course of the EU Customs intellectual property Law Enforcement basis, and analyzes its relevant contents, focusing on the EU intellectual property Customs Protection regulations and the TRIPS Agreement. Using the research method of data analysis and case analysis, the general situation and several typical cases of EU customs intellectual property law enforcement are analyzed. Thirdly, the comparative analysis method is used. From the aspect of entity and procedure, this paper analyzes and compares the differences between China and Europe's customs intellectual property law enforcement system. Finally, it analyzes the current situation and existing problems of China's customs intellectual property law enforcement, and then, on the basis of combining the national conditions of our country, With reference to the EU Customs intellectual property Law Enforcement system, the enlightenment to China's Customs intellectual property Law Enforcement and Enterprise Development is given.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.4;D997
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 吴秀贞;全毅;;我国对外贸易中的知识产权摩擦及对策[J];世界经济研究;2006年02期
2 蒋志培;TRIPS协议对知识产权执法机制的要求[J];人民司法;2001年01期
3 赵世璐;;欧盟海关促进贸易便利化的经验及对中国的启示——以欧盟《海关方案》为研究对象[J];上海海关学院学报;2010年01期
4 张荣忠;;世界海关组织成员国际标准共识[J];世界标准信息;2008年12期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 汤涛;知识产权海关保护制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2009年
本文编号：2275063
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2275063.html
