大陆架的权利基础:自然延伸与距离标准

发布时间：2018-10-22 09:08

【摘要】：大陆架的权利基础是沿海国对其大陆架主张海洋权益的法律依据。《联合国海洋法公约》第76条第1款规定了大陆架的权利基础。在中日东海大陆架划界争端中,日本提出以中间线划界的主要理由是基于专属经济区制度的出现和单一海洋划界的趋势,以证明在200海里范围内距离标准已取代自然延伸原则成为大陆架惟一的权利基础。从条约法、习惯法和判例法的角度对大陆架和专属经济区有关条款及相关国际司法判例、国家实践进行考察,不能得出200海里范围内距离标准已经取代自然延伸原则成为大陆架惟一权利基础这一结论。在中日东海大陆架划界争端中应坚持自然延伸,以公平原则解决划界争端。
[Abstract]:The right basis of the continental shelf is the legal basis for the coastal States to claim the maritime rights and interests of their continental shelf. Article 76, paragraph 1, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea stipulates the right basis of the continental shelf. In the dispute between China and Japan on the delimitation of the continental shelf in the East China Sea, Japan's main reason for proposing the delimitation of the middle line is based on the emergence of the system of exclusive economic zones and the trend towards a single maritime delimitation. To prove that the distance standard within 200 nautical miles has replaced the principle of natural extension as the sole right basis of the continental shelf. From the point of view of treaty law, customary law and case law, to examine the relevant provisions of the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone and relevant international judicial jurisprudence, as well as the practice of States, It is not possible to conclude that the distance criterion within 200 nautical miles has replaced the principle of natural extension as the sole right basis of the continental shelf. In the delimitation dispute of the continental shelf in the East China Sea, China and Japan should adhere to the natural extension and settle the delimitation dispute on the principle of fairness.
【作者单位】：武汉大学国际法研究所;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题《全球化背景下中国海洋权益法律保障研究》(09JZD0023)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D993.5

【共引文献】