《鹿特丹规则》下承运人的陆上区段责任

发布时间：2018-10-22 19:10

【摘要】：随着全球化的进程,国际贸易变得越来越普遍。国际间货物运输的方式也随之产生了很多新变化。“门到门”的运输形式变得越来越普遍。为了促进全球经济一体化的进程,世界各国都认识到国际货物运输法律规范的统一必不可少。但在实际不中,目前对于国际间货物运输的法律十分混乱,更是没有一项可以调节“门到门”式运输的国际公约,《鹿特丹规则》就在此情况下应运而生。 1996年,联合国国际贸易法委员会《UNCITRAL》委托国际海事委员会《CMI》起草新的国际公约。经多年的努力,终于在2008年11月17日,联合国第63届会议审议并通过了《全程或部分海上国际货物运输合同公约》,并在2009年9月23日在荷兰鹿特丹举行开放签署仪式,并将其称为“鹿特丹规则”,同时吁请各国政府考虑成为公约的缔约国。《鹿特丹规则》初衷作为一份海运公约,与以往的三大公约最大的不同这一就在于它不单调整海上运输部分,还对其它的运输方式进行调整,是一份“海运+其他”的运输公约,《鹿特丹规则》的生效势必会对现有的其他运输运输方式产生一定的影响。而对于货物运输来讲,承运人制度的有关规定是重要的内容。因此,本文就以陆上运输为重点对《鹿特丹规则》的生效对相关的承运人的影响做以分析：第一、第二章,分析了《鹿特丹规则》下承运人的定义及识别方法、及承运人的责任区间和责任形式。并将《鹿特丹规则》中的有关规定与现有的海运公约及我国国内法的有关规定进行了比较。第三章,对目前主要的适用于陆上运输区段的货物运输公约做了简要介绍。第四章,将《鹿特丹规则》与现有的主要的适用于陆上运输区段的货物运输公约中关于承运人责任的规定做了详尽的比较,包括承运人的免责事由、赔偿限额等方面。第五章,对《鹿特丹规则》何时能适用于陆上运输区段,该如何适用的问题做了相关分析。
[Abstract]:With the process of globalization, international trade has become more and more common. The mode of international cargo transportation has also produced many new changes. Door-to-door transport is becoming more and more common. In order to promote the process of global economic integration, countries all over the world recognize that the unification of the legal norms of the international carriage of goods is essential. But in practice, the current law on the international carriage of goods is very confusing, and there is no international convention regulating door-to-door transport. The Rotterdam rules came into being in this context. In 1996, The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) commissioned the International Maritime Commission (CMI) to draft new international conventions. After years of efforts, on 17 November 2008, the 63rd session of the United Nations considered and adopted the Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea, and held an open signing ceremony in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, on 23 September 2009, Calling on governments to consider becoming parties to the Convention. The Rotterdam rules were originally intended as a maritime convention, The biggest difference from the previous three conventions is that it not only adjusts the maritime transport component, but also adjusts other modes of transport. The entry into force of Rotterdam rules is bound to have an impact on other existing modes of transport. For the carriage of goods, the relevant provisions of the carrier system is an important content. Therefore, this paper makes an analysis of the impact of the entry into force of the Rotterdam rules on the carriers concerned with the emphasis on land transport: first, chapter two, the definition and identification method of the carrier under the Rotterdam rules are analyzed. And the carrier's liability zone and form of liability. The relevant provisions of the Rotterdam rules are compared with the existing maritime conventions and the relevant provisions of China's domestic law. Chapter three briefly introduces the main conventions on the carriage of goods applicable to the section of land transport. In Chapter 4, the Rotterdam rules are compared with the main provisions on carrier's liability in the existing conventions on the carriage of goods applicable to the section of land transport, including the carrier's exemption, the limitation of compensation, and so on. The fifth chapter analyzes when the Rotterdam rules can be applied to the section of land transport and how to apply them.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.19

【参考文献】