商标平行进口问题的法律研究

发布时间：2018-10-23 16:18

【摘要】：商标产品平行进口,既是知识产权问题,也是国际贸易问题。它集中反映了知识产权专有保护与贸易自由化,商标权人与社会公众利益间的冲突,是各方利益衡量的问题。同时,它不仅是一个法律问题,更是经济政策问题。因此,国际条约难以协调各国利益做出规定,各国立法亦依不同时期采用不同的原则,不存在真正地似是而非的问题。只是在国家利益的大局下,对商标权人、社会公众利益进行权衡。在经济全球化,贸易自由化时代,商品自由流通达到了前所未有的广度,特别是在我国加入世界贸易组织之后,关税相应削减,对外开放的基本国策,同时经济的快速发展,也会催生越来越多的国有知名品牌。面对逐渐增多的商标平行进口问题,我国做出立法选择并填补相应的法律空白就显得尤为重要。本文共分为4章。本文的第1章主要介绍了商标平行进口的基本概念,旨在为进一步了解商标平行进口问题奠定基础,初步提出商标平行进口的关键在于利益权衡,并为了解之后各章的内容,进而引申出本文的结论做了必要的铺垫。本文的第2章探讨了商标平行进口的基础理论,通过对权利用尽理论、进口权理论,归责原则和权利限制理论的介绍,说明了法律选择对商标平行进口禁止抑或允许的理由,同时论证了进口权、归责原则和权利限制理论作为立法技术工具,将商标平行进口问题纳入法律规制的现实可能性。本文的第3章比较分析了欧盟、美国,日本的立法例,并总结出其在有限的禁止抑或允许的立法态度中主要考虑的因素,再加上对国际公约的考察,以使我国立法能够有所借鉴。本文的第4章借由司法实践的困惑,探源到法律规定的空白,进而说明明确立法的必要性,并提出法律建议,以应对国际经贸实践中商标平行进口的涌入。同时结合前述三章,选择以禁止为原则,允许为例外的立法模式。综上,对商标平行进口问题做一全面的法律研究,以求对此问题的整体把握,好将它纳入到法律规制的轨道,以期为法制建设奉上自己微薄的力量。
[Abstract]:Parallel import of trademark products is not only an intellectual property issue, but also an international trade issue. It reflects the proprietary protection of intellectual property and trade liberalization, the conflict between the trademark owner and the public, and it is a matter of measuring the interests of all parties. At the same time, it is not only a legal issue, but also an economic policy issue. Therefore, it is difficult for international treaties to coordinate the interests of various countries and adopt different principles according to different periods of time, so there is no real specious problem. Only in the overall situation of national interests, trademark owners, the public interest. In the era of economic globalization and trade liberalization, the free circulation of commodities has reached an unprecedented breadth. Especially after China's accession to the World Trade Organization, tariffs have been cut correspondingly, the basic national policy of opening up to the outside world has been cut, and the rapid economic development has been achieved. It will also give birth to more and more well-known state-owned brands. In the face of the increasing problem of parallel import of trademark, it is very important for our country to make legislative choices and fill in the corresponding legal gaps. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter mainly introduces the basic concept of trademark parallel import, aiming to lay a foundation for further understanding the problem of trademark parallel import, and puts forward that the key of trademark parallel import lies in the balance of interests, and in order to understand the content of the later chapters, Further, the conclusion of this paper is necessary to pave the way. The second chapter discusses the basic theory of trademark parallel import. By introducing the theory of exhaustion of rights, the theory of import right, the principle of imputation and the theory of limitation of rights, the author explains the reasons why the law chooses to prohibit or permit the parallel import of trademark. At the same time, it demonstrates the possibility of bringing the issue of trademark parallel import into the legal regulation as the legislative technical tool of import right, imputation principle and right restriction theory. The third chapter of this paper compares and analyzes the European Union, the United States and Japan, and summarizes the main factors considered in the limited legislative attitude of prohibition or permission, plus the investigation of international conventions. In order to make our legislation can be used for reference. The fourth chapter of this paper, by the confusion of judicial practice, probes into the blank of legal provisions, and then explains the necessity of clear legislation, and puts forward legal suggestions in order to cope with the influx of parallel imports of trademarks in the practice of international trade and economic cooperation. At the same time, combined with the above three chapters, we choose the legislative model with prohibition as the principle and permission as the exception. In summary, this paper makes a comprehensive legal study on the issue of parallel import of trademarks, in order to grasp the whole problem and bring it into the track of legal regulation, in order to give its own meager strength for the construction of legal system.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D997.1

【参考文献】