南海仲裁案所涉历史性权利问题裁决的国际法批判

发布时间：2018-10-24 12:00

【摘要】：南海仲裁案仲裁庭作出的最终裁决否定了中国在南海的历史性权利。就管辖权而言,仲裁庭的管辖权缺乏依据,因为其裁决不仅以对中国历史性权利主张性质错误的认定为基础,而且对《联合国海洋法公约》第298条的解释和适用存在问题。就实体事项而言,仲裁庭选择以适用《联合国海洋法公约》第311条有关规则为起点,其分析框架缺乏坚实的法理基础,对《联合国海洋法公约》有关条款和相关国际司法和仲裁实践的解释,有失偏颇,结论荒谬,不符合《维也纳条约法公约》关于条约解释的规则。仲裁庭对中国历史性权利证据采用双重标准,忽视了中国渔民发现、开发、利用南海岛礁的行为与有关海域的开发和利用行为密不可分,从而歪曲和否定中国在南海的历史性权利主张。仲裁庭上述裁决预设立场,偏袒菲律宾,显失公平,既不合法,又无正当性。
[Abstract]:The final ruling of the South China Sea Arbitration Tribunal denied China's historic rights in the South China Sea. As far as jurisdiction is concerned, the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal is not only based on the erroneous determination of the nature of China's historical claims, but also on the interpretation and application of article 298 of UNCLOS. With regard to substantive matters, the arbitral tribunal chose to start with the application of the relevant rules of article 311 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the analytical framework of which lacked a solid legal basis, The interpretation of the relevant articles of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and relevant international judicial and arbitration practices is biased and the conclusion is absurd and inconsistent with the rules of the Vienna Convention on the Law of treaties on the interpretation of treaties. The arbitral tribunal adopted a double standard on the evidence of China's historic rights, ignoring the fact that Chinese fishermen found, exploited and utilized islands and reefs in the South China Sea inextricably linked to the development and utilization of the relevant sea areas. Thus distorting and denying China's historical claims in the South China Sea. The arbitral tribunal's presupposition in favour of the Philippines was unfair, illegitimate and illegitimate.
【作者单位】：武汉大学中国边界与海洋研究院;武汉大学国家领土主权与海洋权益协同创新中心;武汉大学国际法研究所;教育部"2011计划"国家领土主权与海洋权益协同创新中心;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目(项目编号:11AZD115)阶段性成果之一
【分类号】：D993.5

【相似文献】